...
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. Biological Sciences >Voting patterns and aSIiance formation in the European Parliament
【24h】

Voting patterns and aSIiance formation in the European Parliament

机译:欧洲议会的投票方式和联盟形成

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have voluntarily formed transnational political groups and invariably follow the voting instructions of these groups. This is intriguing as there are few obvious incentives for doing so. Unlike national parties, for example, the political groups in the European Parliament are not punished by the electorate if they are divided on key issues, as citizens know very little about what goes on inside the European Parliament. This paper pieces together an explanation of why the European political groups exist and why they have become so powerful by looking at the determinants of group cohesion and by undertaking a spatial analysis of voting in the European Parliament. MEPs who share preferences on a range of issues on the European Union policy agenda have an incentive to establish a division-of-labour contract and to share the costs of collecting information. Once internal party policy specialization and agenda setting has been established, MEPs have incentives to follow the voting instructions of their group owing to the advantages of cohesion in a context of repeated voting.
机译:欧洲议会(MEP)成员自愿组成跨国政治团体,并始终遵循这些团体的投票指示。这很有趣,因为这样做的动机很少。例如,与民族政党不同,欧洲议会中的政治团体如果在关键问题上存在分歧,则不会受到选民的惩罚,因为公民对欧洲议会内部的情况知之甚少。本文通过考察群体凝聚力的决定因素以及在欧洲议会中对投票进行空间分析,来解释欧洲政治集团为何存在以及为何如此强大。在欧洲联盟政策议程上对一系列问题拥有共同偏爱的欧洲议会议员有动机建立劳动分工合同并分担收集信息的成本。一旦建立了内部政党政策专业化和议程设置,由于在重复投票的背景下凝聚力的优势,欧洲议会议员有动力遵循其小组的投票指示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号