...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmaceutical patent analyst >Learning from practice: compulsory licensing cases and access to medicines
【24h】

Learning from practice: compulsory licensing cases and access to medicines

机译:从实践中学习:强制许可案件和药品获取

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Compulsory license is one of the safeguards that international IP law provides to address the undesired effects of pharmaceutical patents on access to important medicines. This article looks into three important case examples to analyze the mechanism's effectiveness and feasibility: the first uses of the newer compulsory license regime established in 2003 under the WTO legislative framework to export medicines to third countries, which lack pharmaceutical manufacturing capacities; and further, the first compulsory license grant in India in March 2012. The case analyses are based on the historical, factual and legal background. They reveal the main challenges of the 2003 WTO regime, including the lack of economic incentives for the generic pharmaceutical companies' participation. In the case of India's compulsory license grant, the article takes as in depth look into possible reasons for the reluctance to use the safeguard until recently, and the important aspects and implications of the Indian authorization to manufacture and sell a generic version of a patented cancer drug.
机译:强制许可是国际知识产权法为解决药品专利对获取重要药品的不良影响而提供的保障措施之一。本文研究了三个重要的案例,以分析该机制的有效性和可行性:2003年在WTO立法框架下建立的较新的强制许可制度首次用于将药品出口到缺乏药品生产能力的第三国;并于2012年3月在印度获得了第一笔强制许可。案例分析基于历史,事实和法律背景。它们揭示了2003年WTO体制的主要挑战,包括缺乏对通用制药公司参与的经济激励措施。对于印度的强制许可授予,本文深入探讨了直到最近仍不愿使用保障措施的可能原因,以及印度生产和销售专利癌症仿制药的授权的重要方面和含义。药品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号