首页> 外文期刊>Pharmaceutical patent analyst >How the new Patent Trial and Appeal Board rules impact the practice of inter partes reviews
【24h】

How the new Patent Trial and Appeal Board rules impact the practice of inter partes reviews

机译:新的专利审判和上诉委员会规则如何影响当事人间审查的实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Congress, as part of the American Invents Act (AIA), enacted the inter partes review (IPR) procedure in 2012. An IPR is a trial proceeding before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to review the patentability claims of a patent, but using only prior art consisting of patents or printed publications. Patents covering pharmaceutical products have been, increasingly, under attack by IPR proceedings. Given that there is no standing requirement, hedge funds and so-called public interest groups can readily file a petition for an IPR to invalidate patents owned by pharmaceutical companies.
机译:国会作为《美国发明法》(AIA)的一部分,于2012年制定了部门间审查(IPR)程序。IPR是美国专利商标局(PTO)进行的一项审判程序,旨在审查一项专利的可专利性要求。 ,但仅使用由专利或印刷出版物组成的现有技术。涉及药品的专利越来越受到知识产权程序的攻击。鉴于没有常设要求,对冲基金和所谓的公共利益集团可以随时提出一项知识产权请求,以使制药公司拥有的专利无效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号