首页> 外文期刊>Pharmaceutical patent analyst >November 2015: patent term extension: the Supreme Court of Japan gave an answer to the question and the JPO now has to prepare new examination guidelines
【24h】

November 2015: patent term extension: the Supreme Court of Japan gave an answer to the question and the JPO now has to prepare new examination guidelines

机译:2015年11月:专利期限延长:日本最高法院回答了该问题,日本特许厅现在必须准备新的审查指南

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Supreme Court of Japan said no to the current Patent Examination Guidelines revised by the Japan Patent Office (JPO) in 2011. The case is related to VEGF antagonist (Japanese patent no. 3398382) covering genetically engineered bevacizumab (Avastin~R). The Japan Patent Office rejected an application for patent term extension (PTE) for the reasons based on the 2011 revised Examination Guidelines, which was revised as a result of the Supreme Court Decision in 2011 (Pacif Capsule Case) [2]. The 2011-revised Guidelines stipulate that the PTE application in suit based on a new drug approval shall be rejected if earlier approval was made and the approval is not distinguishable in terms of patent element.
机译:日本最高法院对日本专利局(JPO)在2011年修订的现行专利审查指南表示拒绝。该案与涉及基因工程贝伐单抗(Avastin〜R)的VEGF拮抗剂(日本专利3398382)有关。日本专利局基于2011年修订的《审查指南》而拒绝了专利期限延长(PTE)的申请,该指南是根据2011年最高法院的裁决(Pacif胶囊案)进行修订的[2]。 2011年修订的指南规定,如果事先获得批准并且基于专利成分无法区分批准,则基于新药批准的PTE申请应被拒绝。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号