...
首页> 外文期刊>Petrophysics: The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description >Improved Log Analysis in Shaly-Sandstones--Based on S_w and Hydrocarbon Pore Volume Routine Measurements of Preserved Cores Cut in Oil-Based
【24h】

Improved Log Analysis in Shaly-Sandstones--Based on S_w and Hydrocarbon Pore Volume Routine Measurements of Preserved Cores Cut in Oil-Based

机译:泥质砂岩中测井分析的改进-基于S_w和油基切割岩心的烃孔隙体积常规测量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Routine measurements of properly preserved cores cut in oil-based mud (OEM) give accurate porosity (PHI) and water saturation (S_w) values in hydrocarbon reservoirs. Above mobile water zones the Hydrocarbon Pore Volume (HPV) of these OBM cores is usually accurate in both clean and shaly sand reservoirs. HPV evaluations from the 'core' and the 'total' and 'effective' porosity systems must all be the same: HPV = PHI_(core) (1 - S_(wcore)) = PHI_t (1 - S_(wt)) = PHI_e (1 - S_(we)), where the subscripts denote the specific system being addressed. In shaly reservoirs, core porosity (PHI_(core)) and total porosity (PHI_t) may be larger than effective porosity (PHI_e), with the extra porosity being generated from the drying of the clay minerals, especially smectites. The water volumes measured by Dean-Stark extraction of OBM core plugs includes this clay-bound water, so OBM PHI_(core) and S_(wcore) used together as a pair give an accurate evaluation of HPV. Example core and log data from a shaly-sand formation are evaluated using several well-known log analysis models. As tested, the Dual-Water, Cyberlook and Indonesia models all provide quite similar S_w results and agree fairly well with the OBM S_(wcore) corrected to reservoir conditions. Because the standard Cyberlook and Indonesia S_w results are close to S_(wt), they are paired with total porosity for HPV calculations. They have previously been thought to give S_(we), not S_(wt), and have been paired with 'effective' porosity giving pessimistic HPV results. The Archie total porosity model also gives useful, but pessimistic, results. The Archie effective porosity model gives very pessimistic S_w and HPV results in shaly sands. The most accurate evaluation method, the OBM core analysis, can be used to calibrate current resistivity-S_w models for shaly sands. This process leads to improved estimates of oil- and gas-in-place and, potentially, to improved shaly-sand models for application in worldwide log analysis.
机译:对油基泥浆(OEM)中切下的保存完好的岩心进行例行测量,可得出油气藏中的准确孔隙率(PHI)和水饱和度(S_w)值。在流动水带以上,这些OBM岩心的烃孔体积(HPV)在清洁和泥质砂岩储层中通常都是准确的。 “核心”,“总”和“有效”孔隙度系统的HPV评估必须全部相同:HPV = PHI_(core)(1-S_(wcore))= PHI_t(1-S_(wt))= PHI_e (1-S_(we)),其中下标表示要处理的特定系统。在泥质油藏中,岩心孔隙度(PHI_(core))和总孔隙度(PHI_t)可能大于有效孔隙度(PHI_e),而粘土矿物(尤其是蒙脱石)的干燥会产生额外的孔隙度。通过OBM芯塞的Dean-Stark提取测得的水量包括黏土结合水,因此OBM PHI_(core)和S_(wcore)一起使用可准确评估HPV。使用几种众所周知的测井分析模型对来自泥质砂岩地层的示例岩心和测井数据进行了评估。经过测试,Dual-Water,Cyber​​look和Indonesia模型都提供了非常相似的S_w结果,并且与根据储层条件校正的OBM S_(wcore)非常吻合。因为标准Cyber​​look和Indonesia S_w结果接近S_(wt),所以将它们与总孔隙率配对以进行HPV计算。以前认为它们能产生S_(we),而不是S_(wt),并且已与“有效”孔隙率配对,给出了悲观的HPV结果。 Archie总孔隙度模型也给出了有用但悲观的结果。阿尔奇有效孔隙度模型给出了非常悲观的S_w和页岩砂中的HPV结果。最准确的评估方法是OBM岩心分析,可用于校准泥质砂岩的电流电阻率S_w模型。此过程可改善对现场油气的估计,并有可能改善可用于全球测井分析的泥质砂岩模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号