首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on Psychological Science >On Klatzky and Creswell (2014): Saving Social Priming Effects But Losing Science as We Know It?
【24h】

On Klatzky and Creswell (2014): Saving Social Priming Effects But Losing Science as We Know It?

机译:关于Klatzky和Creswell(2014):保存社会启动效应,但失去我们所知的科学吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Klatzky and Creswell (2014) offer an interpretation of the unreliability of social priming effects by analogizing them to what is known about the complexity of cross-modal transfer effects in perception. The complexity of these transfer effects arises because they are both multiply determined and stochastic. In this commentary, I argue that Klatzky and Creswell's thoughtful contribution raises the possibility that there might be deep and substantive limits to both the replicability and the generalizability of many of the phenomena that most interest psychologists, including social priming effects. Psychological phenomena largely governed by what Fodor (1983) called the central system may resist both replication and generalization by their very nature and not because of weak and underpowered experimental methods. With such phenomena, science might give us very good tools for explanation, but not for prediction (replication).
机译:Klatzky and Creswell(2014)通过将社会启动效应与感知中的交叉模式转移效应的复杂性相类比,对社会启动效应的不可靠性进行了解释。这些转移效应的复杂性是因为它们都是多重确定的并且是随机的。在这篇评论中,我认为克拉茨基和克雷斯韦尔的深思熟虑提出了这样一种可能性,即对大多数心理学家感兴趣的许多现象的可复制性和可推广性都可能存在深远的实质性限制,包括社会启动效应。心理现象很大程度上受Fodor(1983)所称的中央系统的支配,其本质本身可以抵制复制和泛化,而不是因为实验方法薄弱且功能不足。对于这种现象,科学可能为我们提供了很好的解释工具,但没有提供预测(复制)工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号