...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric emergency care >The use of restraint for pediatric psychiatric patients in emergency departments.
【24h】

The use of restraint for pediatric psychiatric patients in emergency departments.

机译:急诊科对儿科精神病患者使用约束装置。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To identify current practice and staff education regarding the use of restraint in emergency departments for children undergoing psychiatric evaluations and to compare restraint practice and education in emergency medicine residencies (EMRs) and pediatric emergency medicine fellowships (PEMFs). METHODS: A self-administered survey regarding staff and resident education and the use of restraint for emergency pediatric patients undergoing psychiatric evaluation was mailed to the directors of EMRs and PEMFs. Main outcome measures included frequency of restraint use, staff trained in restraint use, favored positions for physical restraint, and agents regularly used for chemical restraint. RESULTS: Forty-one percent (48/118) of EMRs and 66% (33/50) of PEMFs completed the survey. The great majority of both EMRs and PEMFs report use of physical and chemical restraint in 5% or less of pediatric psychiatric patients. Forty of 47 EMRs and 29 of 32 PEMFs have formal policies on physical restraint use. Far fewer programs have formal policies for chemical restraint (13/33 EMRs and 5/28 PEMFs). A large percentage of both EMRs and PEMFs do not teach their trainees about the application of restraints (EMR = 52%, PEMF = 82%) or the appropriate situations in which to use restraint (EMR = 35%, PEMF = 64%). However, EMRs were more likely than PEMFs to teach about both appropriate restraint application and appropriate situations for their use (RR = 2.6, 1.2-5.8 and RR = 1.8, 1.1-2.9, respectively). The supine position was the position favored by both groups for physical restraint. Therapeutic holding was infrequently used, mostly for younger children. Seventy-two percent of EMRs and 85% of PEMFs used chemical restraint in children. Benzodiazepines and butyrophenones were the most commonly used agents. However, butyrophenones were often misclassified as phenothiazines by both EMRs and PEMFs. CONCLUSION: Restraint, both physical and chemical, is a widely, but uncommonly used, intervention for pediatric psychiatric patients in emergency departments. Many EMRs and PEMFs do not teach residents about restraint.
机译:目的:确定有关接受急诊科对接受精神病学评估的儿童使用约束的现行实践和员工教育,并比较急诊住院医师(EMR)和儿科急诊医学研究金(PEMF)的约束实践和教育。方法:将有关员工和住院医师教育以及对接受心理评估的急诊儿科患者使用约束的自我管理调查邮寄给EMR和PEMF主任。主要结局指标包括使用约束的频率,接受约束使用培训的人员,偏爱物理约束的职位以及经常用于化学约束的药剂。结果:41%(48/118)的EMR和66%(33/50)的PEMF完成了调查。 EMR和PEMF绝大多数都报告了在5%或更少的儿科精神病患者中使用物理和化学约束。 47个EMR中有40个以及32个PEMF中有29个具有使用物理约束的正式政策。很少有针对化学限制的正式政策(13/33 EMR和5/28 PEMF)。大部分EMR和PEMF都没有教他们的学员有关约束的应用(EMR = 52%,PEMF = 82%)或使用约束的适当情况(EMR = 35%,PEMF = 64%)。但是,与PEMF相比,EMR更可能讲授适当的约束施加方法和使用条件(分别为RR = 2.6、1.2-5.8和RR = 1.8、1.1-2.9)。仰卧位是两组人都喜欢的身体约束位置。很少使用治疗方法,主要用于年幼的孩子。儿童中有72%的EMR和85%的PEMF使用了化学抑制剂。苯二氮卓类和丁苯酮类是最常用的药物。但是,EMR和PEMF经常将丁苯酮误分类为吩噻嗪。结论:物理和化学上的约束是急诊科中小儿精神病患者广泛但不常用的干预措施。许多EMR和PEMF并未向居民传授节制的知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号