首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric critical care medicine: a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies >Theophylline versus terbutaline in treating critically ill children with status asthmaticus: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
【24h】

Theophylline versus terbutaline in treating critically ill children with status asthmaticus: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

机译:茶碱与特布他林在重症哮喘病儿童中的治疗:一项前瞻性,随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of theophylline, terbutaline, or theophylline combined with terbutaline treatment in critically ill children with status asthmaticus who are already receiving continuous nebulized albuterol and intravenous corticosteroids. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blind trial. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary-care children's medical center. PATIENTS: Forty critically ill children between the ages of 3 and 15 yrs with impending respiratory failure secondary to status asthmaticus. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received intravenous methylprednisolone and continuous nebulized albuterol. The three study groups received theophylline plus placebo (group 1), terbutaline plus placebo (group 2), or theophylline and terbutaline together (group 3). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Differences in baseline characteristics, change in clinical asthma score over time, length of pediatric intensive care unit stay, and incidence of adverse events were determined. The three study groups were similar in age, gender, race, asthma severity, and treatment. There were no differences in clinical asthma score over time, length of pediatric intensive care unit stay, or incidence of adverse events between the three groups, with the exception of a higher incidence of nausea in children in group 3. The median hospital cost of medication and theophylline blood levels was significantly lower in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3 (Dollars 280 vs. Dollars 3,908 vs. Dollars 4,045, respectively, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Theophylline, when added to continuous nebulized albuterol therapy and intravenous corticosteroids, is as effective as terbutaline in treating critically ill children with status asthmaticus. The addition of theophylline to baseline therapy is more cost-effective when compared with terbutaline alone or terbutaline and theophylline together. Theophylline should be considered for use early in the management of critically ill asthmatic children.
机译:目的:比较茶碱,特布他林或茶碱与特布他林联合治疗在已接受持续雾化沙丁胺醇和静脉注射糖皮质激素治疗的重症哮喘儿童中的疗效。设计:随机,前瞻性,对照,双盲试验。地点:三级医疗儿童医疗中心的儿科重症监护室。患者:40名3至15岁之间的重症儿童,其继发于哮喘状态而即将发生呼吸衰竭。干预措施:所有患者均接受静脉注射甲基强的松龙和连续雾化的沙丁胺醇。这三个研究组分别接受茶碱加安慰剂(第1组),特布他林加安慰剂(第2组)或茶碱和特布他林一起(第3组)。测量和主要结果:确定基线特征,临床哮喘评分随时间变化,儿科重症监护病房住院时间长短和不良事件发生率的差异。这三个研究组的年龄,性别,种族,哮喘严重程度和治疗方法相似。三组之间的临床哮喘评分随时间推移,小儿重症监护病房住院时间长短或不良事件发生率无差异,但第三组儿童恶心的发生率较高。与第2组和第3组相比,第1组的茶碱和茶碱血水平显着降低(分别为280美元对3,908美元对4,045美元,p <.0001)。结论:茶碱在连续雾化沙丁胺醇疗法和静脉注射皮质类固醇激素中使用时,与特布他林一样有效,可治疗重症哮喘病儿童。与单独使用特布他林或特布他林和茶碱一起使用时,在基础疗法中添加茶碱具有更高的成本效益。茶碱应考虑在重症哮喘儿童的早期治疗中使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号