首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Randomized Trial
【24h】

Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Randomized Trial

机译:双相气道正压或持续气道正压:随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: There is currently no clear evidence that nasal-biphasic positive airway pressure (n-BiPAP) confers any advantage over nasal-continuous positive airway pressure (n-CPAP). Our hypothesis was that preterm infants born before 30 weeks' gestation and <2 weeks old when extubated onto n-BiPAP will have a lower risk of extubation failure than infants extubated onto n-CPAP at equivalent mean airway pressure.
机译:背景:目前尚无明确证据表明鼻双相气道正压通气(n-BiPAP)比鼻腔连续气道正压通气(n-CPAP)具有任何优势。我们的假设是,在同等的平均气道压力下,将早于妊娠30周出生且小于2周大的早产儿拔管至n-BiPAP时的拔管失败风险要比拔管至n-CPAP的婴儿低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号