...
首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives in Biology and Medicine >Disparities and discrimination in health care coverage: a critique of the Institute of Medicine study.
【24h】

Disparities and discrimination in health care coverage: a critique of the Institute of Medicine study.

机译:卫生保健覆盖范围上的差异和歧视:对医学研究所研究的批评。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The 2003 Institute of Medicine (IOM) study on Unequal Treatment takes the strong position that many of the current disparities in health care by race are attributable to forms of conscious and unconscious discrimination by health care providers. The study, however, is flawed by imprecise definitions of discrimination that fail to distinguish between differences in treatment due to breakdown in communications and differences in the treated population that are prompted by invidious motives of health care providers. It is doubtful that hidden forms of discrimination are prevalent in a profession whose professional norms are set so strongly against it. In addition, the IOM relies too uncritically on similar studies in unrelated fields to show the ostensible forms of discrimination. These errors have adverse social consequences. A false diagnosis of discrimination where none exists will send a false signal to members of racial minorities that may induce them to avoid receiving needed medical care and instead pursue costly and ineffective remedial devices that will take away funds better spent on providing direct health care.
机译:2003年医学研究所(IOM)对不平等待遇的研究认为,当前种族之间在医疗保健方面的许多差异可归因于医疗保健提供者的有意识和无意识歧视形式。然而,该研究的局限性在于对歧视的不精确定义,该定义未能区分由于沟通中断而导致的治疗差异与由于医疗保健提供者的动机动机而导致的治疗人群差异。令人怀疑的是,在专业准则被强烈反对的行业中,普遍存在着隐藏的歧视形式。另外,IOM过于不依赖于无关领域的类似研究,以显示表面上的歧视形式。这些错误会带来不利的社会后果。对不存在歧视的错误诊断会向少数族裔成员发送错误信号,这可能会诱使他们避免接受必要的医疗服务,而是寻求昂贵且无效的补救设备,这会夺去用于直接医疗保健的资金。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号