首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric Pulmonology >Respiratory oscillation mechanics in infants with bronchiolitis during mechanical ventilation (see comments)
【24h】

Respiratory oscillation mechanics in infants with bronchiolitis during mechanical ventilation (see comments)

机译:机械通气期间毛细支气管炎婴儿的呼吸振荡机制(请参阅评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of the study was to describe the pattern of respiratory oscillation mechanics and responses to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in bronchiolitis. Six infants were studied during the course of mechanical ventilation. A 20 Hz sinusoidal pressure variation was applied at the endotracheal tube where flow was measured with a pneumotachograph. Resistance and reactance obtained from the complex pressure-flow ratio were separated during inspiration (R(rs,i); X(rs,i)) and expiration (R(rs,e); X(rs,e)), and the differences between R(rs,i) and R(rs,e) (deltaR(rs)) and X(rs,i) and X(rs,e) (deltaX(rs)) were calculated. The data were corrected for the mechanical characteristics of the endotracheal tube. The measurements were repeated while PEEP was varied between 0 and 8 hPa. Two infants were found to have normal R(rs) and near-zero X(rs) and both parameters exhibited little change within the respiratory cycle or with varying PEEP. Four infants had high R(rs) at zero PEEP. In two, R(rs,i) was markedly elevated (108.5 and 85.2 hPa.s/L, respectively), and X(rs,i) was markedly negative (-25.0 and -22.5 hPa.s/L, respectively) at zero PEEP, while deltaR(rs) and deltaX(rs) were small. R(rs,i) and the absolute value of X(rs,i) decreased with increasing PEEP. This pattern of oscillation mechanics was consistent with low lung volumes and atelectasis, being reversed by increasing PEEP. In the remaining two subjects, R(rs,i) was moderately elevated (57.8 and 53.6 hPa.s/L, respectively) and X(rs,i) moderately negative (-12.5 and -7.7 hPa.s/L, respectively) at zero PEEP. DeltaR(rs) (-59.8 and -56.5 hPa.s/L, respectively) and delta(rs) (28.1 and 48.7 hPa.s/L, respectively) were large, but were dramatically reduced by increasing PEEP. These patterns were consistent with expiratory airflow limitation. Measurements of respiratory impedance are, therefore, informative in regard to the pathophysiological mechanisms occurring in bronchiolitis during mechanical ventilation, and they may be helpful in setting the level and assessing the effect of PEEP.
机译:该研究的目的是描述细支气管炎的呼吸振荡机制和对呼气末正压(PEEP)的反应。在机械通气过程中对六个婴儿进行了研究。在气管插管处施加20 Hz的正弦压力变化,并用气动描记器测量流量。从复数压力-流量比获得的阻力和电抗在吸气(R(rs,i); X(rs,i))和呼气期间(R(rs,e); X(rs,e))分开,并且计算R(rs,i)和R(rs,e)(deltaR(rs))与X(rs,i)和X(rs,e)(deltaX(rs))之间的差异。针对气管导管的机械特性对数据进行了校正。重复测量,同时PEEP在0至8 hPa之间变化。发现两个婴儿的R(rs)正常且X(rs)接近零,并且两个参数在呼吸周期内或PEEP变化时均显示出很小的变化。四名婴儿在PEEP为零时具有较高的R(rs)。在两个实验中,R(rs,i)在(在此温度下)显着升高(分别为108.5和85.2 hPa.s / L),X(rs,i)在显着下移(分别为-25.0和-22.5 hPa.s / L) PEEP为零,而deltaR(rs)和deltaX(rs)很小。 R(rs,i)和X(rs,i)的绝对值随PEEP的增加而降低。这种振荡机制与低肺活量和肺不张相一致,可通过增加PEEP来逆转。在其余两个受试者中,R(rs,i)适度升高(分别为57.8和53.6 hPa.s / L),X(rs,i)适度呈阴性(分别为-12.5和-7.7 hPa.s / L)。 PEEP为零。 DeltaR(rs)(分别为-59.8和-56.5 hPa.s / L)和delta(rs)(分别为28.1和48.7 hPa.s / L)大,但是通过增加PEEP可以显着降低。这些模式与呼气气流限制相一致。因此,呼吸阻抗的测量对于在机械通气期间毛细支气管炎中发生的病理生理机制提供了有益的信息,它们可能有助于设定水平和评估PEEP的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号