首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric Pulmonology >Functional residual capacity (FRC) measurements by plethysmography and helium dilution in normal infants.
【24h】

Functional residual capacity (FRC) measurements by plethysmography and helium dilution in normal infants.

机译:通过体积描记法和氦气稀释对正常婴儿进行功能残余容量(FRC)测量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Comparative measurements of functional residual capacity (FRC) made by plethysmography (FRCpleth) and by helium dilution (FRCHe) were obtained on 27 infants and young children without known pulmonary disease (14 males, 13 females; 4 weeks-26 months; mean age 32.2 weeks) while under chloral hydrate sedation. Clinical histories, clinical examinations, and pulmonary functions were normal for all members of the group. FRCpleth, whether measured near end expiration (EE) or near end inspiration (EI), and corrected to mean expiratory levels of at least 3 breathing cycles, was consistently and significantly greater than FRCHe. Comparative values for mean (+/- standard deviation) were FRCpleth EE, 182.0 (+/- 79.7) mL and FRCpleth El, 171.8 (+/- 77.4) mL vs. FRCHe, 154 (+/- 72.2) mL, P < 0.0001 and P < 0.005, respectively. Normalizing values by weight, FRCpleth EE was 23.8 mL/kg (+/- 5.3) vs. FRCHe, 20.2 (+/- 4.7) mL/kg, mean (+/- standard deviation). The difference between FRCpleth and FRCHe, expressed as FRCpleth - FRCHe/FRCpleth x 100, was 9% for occlusions at end inspiration and 16% for occlusions at end expiration. The following equations describe our FRC results in relation to length: In (FRCHe) = 2.74 x ln (length) - 6.53 r2 = 0.781 slope = 2.74 +/- 0.29 SE Y intercept = 6.53 +/- 1.12 SE ln (FRCPleth EI) = 2.69 x ln (length) - 6.21 r2 = 0.752 slope = 2.69 +/- 0.31 SE Y intercept = 6.21 +/- 1.29 SE The difference between FRCpleth and FRCHe was more marked when occlusions were performed at end expiration than at end inspiration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
机译:通过体积描记法(FRCpleth)和氦稀释(FRCHe)对27例无已知肺病的婴幼儿(男性14例,女性13例; 4周至26个月;平均年龄32.2)进行了功能残留能力(FRC)的比较测量。周),同时进行水合氯醛镇静。该组所有成员的临床历史,临床检查和肺功能均正常。 FRCpleth,无论是在呼气末期(EE)还是在呼气末期(EI)进行测量,并校正为至少3个呼吸周期的平均呼气水平,始终且显着大于FRCHe。平均值的比较值(+/-标准偏差)是FRCpleth EE,182.0(+/- 79.7)mL和FRCpleth El,171.8(+/- 77.4)mL与FRCHe,154(+/- 72.2)mL,P <分别为0.0001和P <0.005。按重量归一化的值,FRCpleth EE为23.8 mL / kg(+/- 5.3),而FRCHe为20.2(+/- 4.7)mL / kg,平均值(+/-标准偏差)。 FRCpleth和FRCHe之间的差异表示为FRCpleth-FRCHe / FRCpleth x 100,对于末端吸气而言为9%,对于末端吸气而言为16%。以下等式描述了与长度有关的FRC结果:In(FRCHe)= 2.74 x ln(长度)-6.53 r2 = 0.781斜率= 2.74 +/- 0.29 SE Y截距= 6.53 +/- 1.12 SE ln(FRCPleth EI) = 2.69 x ln(长度)-6.21 r2 = 0.752坡度= 2.69 +/- 0.31 SE Y截距= 6.21 +/- 1.29 SE当在呼气末进行闭塞时,FRCpleth与FRCHe之间的差异比吸气末明显。 (摘要以250字截断)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号