首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric cardiology >Comparison between cardiac output measured by the pulmonary arterial thermodilution technique and that measured by the femoral arterial thermodilution technique in a pediatric animal model.
【24h】

Comparison between cardiac output measured by the pulmonary arterial thermodilution technique and that measured by the femoral arterial thermodilution technique in a pediatric animal model.

机译:在儿科动物模型中,通过肺动脉热稀释技术测量的心输出量与通过股动脉热稀释技术测量的心输出量之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study compares the correlation between two methods for the determination of cardiac output-the pulmonary arterial thermodilution technique using the Swan-Ganz catheter and the femoral arterial thermodilution technique using a pulse contour analysis computer (PiCCO) catheter. We performed a prospective animal study using 16 immature Maryland pigs weighing 9 to 16 kg. A 5.5- or 7.5-Fr Swan-Ganz catheter was introduced into the femoral or jugular vein, and a 4- or 5-Fr arterial PiCCO catheter was introduced into the femoral artery. In each animal, we made measurements of cardiac output at 30-minute intervals, simultaneously by pulmonary arterial thermodilution and femoral arterial thermodilution, before, during, and after hemodiafiltration carried out via different venous catheters, recording a total of 78 measurements. The mean Swan-Ganz cardiac output was 2.22 +/- 0.94 L/min, and mean PiCCO cardiac output was 1.94 +/- 0.80 L/min (no significant difference). The mean difference (bias) of differences(limits of agreement) was 0.2812. The differences between the methods increased with higher cardiac output, but the percentage differences in relation to cardiac output remained stable. Good correlation was found between the two methods: single-measure intraclass correlation was 0.8892 (95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.95). There were no differences between the 5.5- and 7.5-FR Swan-Ganz catheters or between the 4- and 5-Fr PiCCO catheters. Femoral arterial thermodilution cardiac output measurements correlated well with pulmonary arterial thermodilution cardiac output measurements in a pediatric animal model.
机译:这项研究比较了两种确定心输出量的方法之间的相关性-使用Swan-Ganz导管的肺动脉热稀释技术和使用脉冲轮廓分析计算机(PiCCO)导管的股动脉热稀释技术。我们使用16头体重9至16公斤的未成熟马里兰猪进行了前瞻性动物研究。将5.5-Fr或7.5-Fr的Swan-Ganz导管插入股静脉或颈静脉,将4-Fr或5-Fr的动脉PiCCO导管引入股动脉。在每只动物中,我们通过不同的静脉导管进行血液透析滤过之前,之中和之后,通过肺动脉热稀释和股动脉热稀释同时测量心输出量,间隔为30分钟,共记录78项测量值。 Swan-Ganz平均心输出量为2.22 +/- 0.94 L / min,PiCCO平均心输出量为1.94 +/- 0.80 L / min(无显着性差异)。差异(一致限)的平均差异(偏差)为0.2812。两种方法之间的差异随着心输出量的增加而增加,但是相对于心输出量的百分比差异保持稳定。两种方法之间发现了良好的相关性:单项测量类内相关性为0.8892(95%置信区间为0.54-0.95)。 5.5和7.5 FR Swan-Ganz导管之间或4和5-Fr PiCCO导管之间没有差异。在儿科动物模型中,股动脉热稀释心输出量测量与肺动脉热稀释心输出量测量密切相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号