...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric blood & cancer >Evaluation of semi-quantitative scoring system for metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) scans in patients with relapsed neuroblastoma.
【24h】

Evaluation of semi-quantitative scoring system for metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) scans in patients with relapsed neuroblastoma.

机译:半定量评分系统对复发性神经母细胞瘤患者间碘碘苄基胍(mIBG)扫描的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of two semi-quantitative scoring systems to assess response to (131)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) therapy in recurrent neuroblastoma. PROCEDURES: Diagnostic mIBG scan pairs (n = 57) were collected for patients who underwent (131)I-mIBG therapy for relapsed neuroblastoma. Two scoring systems were designated: Method 1, which divided the body into nine segments to view osteomedullary lesions with an additional tenth segment to assess soft tissue involvement; and Method 2, which divided the body into seven segments without a corresponding compartment for soft tissue involvement. Four nuclear medicine physicians independently assigned extension and intensity scores utilizing both methods, and separately recorded their impression of whether the post-therapy scan had improved, not changed, or worsened. Inter- and intra-observer concordance and correlation with overall response and progression-free survival (PFS) were performed. RESULTS: Method 1 produced the highest inter-observer concordance and was used to calculate the relative extension scores (post-therapy score divided by pre-therapy score), which correlated significantly with overall response. Patients who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (n = 21) had lower relative extension scores, compared to those without response (P < 0.001). The readers' overall impression associated highly (P < 0.001) with the relative extension scores though results were less quantitative. Concordance was higher if initial scores were >5. Relative extension score did not predict PFS. CONCLUSION: Semi-quantitative scoring of mIBG scans provides a more reliable method of assessing response in patients with relapsed neuroblastoma than qualitative impression. The reproducibility and high inter-observer concordance makes mIBG score an important component of overall response criteria in patients with recurrent neuroblastoma.
机译:背景:这项研究的目的是确定两个半定量评分系统的准确性,以评估对复发性神经母细胞瘤对(131)I-甲氧苄基胍(mIBG)治疗的反应。程序:对接受(131)I-mIBG复发性神经母细胞瘤治疗的患者收集了诊断性mIBG扫描对(n = 57)。指定了两种评分系统:方法1,将身体分为九个部分以查看骨髓损伤,另外第十个部分评估软组织受累;和方法2,将身体分为七个部分,没有相应的隔室用于软组织的侵害。四位核医学医师分别使用这两种方法分别指定了扩展和强度评分,并分别记录了他们对治疗后扫描是否有所改善,未改变或恶化的印象。观察者之间和观察者之间的一致性,以及与总体反应和无进展生存期(PFS)的相关性。结果:方法1产生了最高的观察者间一致性,并被用来计算相对延伸评分(治疗后评分除以治疗前评分),这与总体反应显着相关。与没有缓解的患者相比,获得完全缓解(CR)或部分缓解(PR)(n = 21)的患者的相对扩展评分较低。读者的总体印象与相对扩展分数高度相关(P <0.001),尽管结果定量程度较低。如果初始分数> 5,则一致性更高。相对延伸评分不能预测PFS。结论:mIBG扫描的半定量评分比定性印象提供了一种更可靠的评估复发性神经母细胞瘤患者反应的方法。可重复性和高观察者间一致性使mIBG评分成为复发性神经母细胞瘤患者总体反应标准的重要组成部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号