首页> 外文期刊>Patient education and counseling >Genetics specialists' perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting
【24h】

Genetics specialists' perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting

机译:遗传学专家对临床环境中基因组偶然发现的披露的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Evidence documenting management of incidental findings (IFs) from clinical genomic testing is limited. The aim of this study was to examine genetics specialists' perspectives regarding current and preferred disclosure of clinical genomic IFs. Methods: 50 genetics specialists, including medical geneticists, laboratory professionals, genetic counselors, and nurses participated in structured telephone interviews. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis and descriptive statistics. Results: Most specialists had encountered IFs, but definitions of IFs varied. They discussed challenges with informing patients about the prospect of IFs and disclosing IFs to patients. Causing psychological harm to patients was a concern. Participants were divided on whether IFs needed to be clinically significant and/or actionable in order to be disclosed to patients. Creating formal disclosure guidelines was considered useful, but only if they were flexible. Additional counseling, more interdisciplinary communication, maintaining contact with patients, and a centralized database to interpret IFs were also proposed. Conclusion: Genetics specialists offer insights into the challenges of defining IFs, knowing when and how to disclose them, and the potential need for flexible disclosure guidelines. Practice implications: Further discussion between practicing genetics specialists is needed to develop consensus on the development of best-practice guidelines for IF management.
机译:目的:临床基因组测试中偶然发现(IF)管理的证据文献有限。这项研究的目的是检验遗传学专家对当前和首选的临床基因组IF披露的观点。方法:包括医学遗传学家,实验室专家,遗传顾问和护士在内的50名遗传学专家参加了结构化电话采访。使用定性内容分析和描述性统计分析数据。结果:大多数专家都遇到过IF,但是IF的定义各不相同。他们讨论了在告知患者有关IF的前景以及向患者披露IF方面的挑战。对患者造成心理伤害是一个问题。参与者对于是否需要将IFs具有临床意义和/或可操作性进行划分,才能向患者披露。创建正式的披露准则被认为是有用的,但前提是要灵活。还提出了额外的咨询,更多的跨学科交流,保持与患者的联系以及用于解释IF的集中数据库。结论:遗传学专家提供了有关定义IF的挑战,知道何时以及如何公开它们的见解,以及对灵活公开指南的潜在需求。实际影响:需要遗传学专家之间的进一步讨论,才能就制定IF管理最佳实践指南达成共识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号