首页> 外文期刊>Patient education and counseling >Effect of a group-based rehabilitation programme on glycaemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes patients: the Copenhagen Type 2 Diabetes Rehabilitation Project.
【24h】

Effect of a group-based rehabilitation programme on glycaemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes patients: the Copenhagen Type 2 Diabetes Rehabilitation Project.

机译:基于小组的康复计划对2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制和心血管危险因素的影响:哥本哈根2型糖尿病康复项目。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a group-based rehabilitation programme with an individual counselling programme at improving glycaemic control and cardiovascular risk factors among patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We randomised 143 adult type 2 diabetes patients to either a 6-month multidisciplinary group-based rehabilitation programme or a 6-month individual counselling programme. Outcome measures included glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), blood pressure, lipid profile, weight, and waist circumference. RESULTS: Mean HbA(1c) decreased 0.3%-point (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.5, -0.1) in the rehabilitation group and 0.6%-point (95% CI = -0.8, -0.4) among individual counselling participants (p<0.05). Within both groups, equal reductions occurred in body weight, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, but no significant between-group differences between occurred for any of the cardiovascular outcomes. The group-based rehabilitation programme consumed twice as many personnel resources. CONCLUSION: The group-based rehabilitation programme resulted in changes in glycaemic control and cardiovascular risk factor reduction that were equivalent or inferior to those of an individual counselling programme. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The group-based rehabilitation programme, tested in the current design, did not offer additionally improved outcomes and consumed more personnel resources than the individual counselling programme; its broad implementation is not supported by this study. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00284609.
机译:目的:比较团体康复计划和个人咨询计划在改善2型糖尿病患者血糖控制和心血管危险因素方面的有效性。方法:我们将143名成人2型糖尿病患者随机分为6个月的基于多学科小组的康复计划或6个月的个人咨询计划。结果指标包括糖化血红蛋白(HbA(1c)),血压,脂质分布,体重和腰围。结果:康复组的平均HbA(1c)降低0.3%点(95%置信区间[CI] = -0.5,-0.1),个体咨询降低0.6%点(95%CI = -0.8,-0.4)参与者(p <0.05)。在两组中,体重,腰围,收缩压和舒张压均出现相同的降低,但在任何心血管结局方面,两组之间均无显着差异。基于小组的康复计划消耗了两倍的人力资源。结论:基于小组的康复计划导致血糖控制的改变和心血管危险因素的减少与个体咨询计划的改变相当或逊于个人。实践意义:在当前设计中经过测试的基于群体的康复计划没有提供比单独的辅导计划更多的改善结果,并且消耗了更多的人力资源。本研究不支持其广泛实施。试用注册Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00284609。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号