...
首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >The intravenous to oral relative milligram potency ratio of morphine during chronic dosing in cancer pain.
【24h】

The intravenous to oral relative milligram potency ratio of morphine during chronic dosing in cancer pain.

机译:在癌症疼痛的长期给药过程中,吗啡的静脉内/口服相对毫克效价比。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Morphine (M) is the opioid analgesic of choice for severe cancer pain. The IV to PO M equipotent switch ratio (CR) is controversial. We designed this prospective observational cohort to confirm the efficacy and safety of M IV to PO CR of 1:3. Consecutive cancer patients admitted to an inpatient palliative medicine unit were screened for inclusion. Pain was managed by palliative medicine specialists. They were blinded to the patient data collected, and the calculated CR. The switch was considered successful if the following criteria were met: (1) Pain adequately controlled: pain rated as none or mild (2) Number of RD less than 4 (for non incident pain) per 24 hours (3) No limiting side effects. We used Day 3 ATC M dose for CR calculations. The major outcome measures were the IV : PO CR ratio, morphine doses (mg/day), pain severity, number of PRN doses, and day 1 and day 3side effects. Descriptive statistics were used to report mean, median, standard deviation and range of different variables. Two hundred and fifty six consecutive admissions were screened, and 106 were eligible for the study. Sixty two underwent a successful M route switch and were included in this analysis. A ratio of 1:3 was safely implemented over a wide M dose range. About 80% were successfully switched with a calculated CR of 1:3. 20% required an oral M dose adjustment after route switch either to better pain control or reduce side effects with a resultant higher (e.g. 1:4) or lower (e.g. 1:2) calculated potency ratios respectively. A potency ratio of 1:3 was safe as evaluated by common M side-effects, the dose also easy to calculate. The 1: 3 M IV to PO relative milligram potency ratio appears correct and practical for most patients over a wide M dose range.
机译:吗啡(M)是严重癌症疼痛的首选阿片类镇痛药。 IV与PO M的等电位转换比(CR)有争议。我们设计了此前瞻性观察队列,以确认M IV对PO CR为1:3的疗效和安全性。对入院姑息治疗科的连续癌症患者进行筛查。疼痛由姑息医学专家管理。他们对收集的患者数据和计算出的CR视而不见。如果满足以下条件,则认为该切换成功:(1)疼痛得到充分控制:疼痛定为无或轻度(2)每24小时RD数小于4(对于非偶然性疼痛)(3)无限制性副作用。我们将第3天的ATC M剂量用于CR计算。主要结局指标为IV:PO CR比,吗啡剂量(mg /天),疼痛严重程度,PRN剂量数以及第1天和第3天的副作用。描述性统计用于报告均值,中位数,标准差和不同变量的范围。筛选了256个连续入学的患者,其中106个符合研究条件。有62个成功进行了M路由切换,并包含在此分析中。在较宽的M剂量范围内安全地实现了1:3的比例。成功切换了约80%的设备,计算出的CR为1:3。 20%的患者需要在路线转换后调整口服M剂量,以更好地控制疼痛或减少副作用,从而分别产生更高(例如1:4)或更低(例如1:2)的计算效价比。通过常见的M副作用评估,效价比为1:3是安全的,剂量也易于计算。对于大多数患者,在宽的M剂量范围内,1:3 M IV与PO的相对效力比看来是正确且实用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号