首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >Knowledge and information needs of informal caregivers in palliative care: a qualitative systematic review.
【24h】

Knowledge and information needs of informal caregivers in palliative care: a qualitative systematic review.

机译:姑息治疗中非正式护理人员的知识和信息需求:定性的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To review current understanding of the knowledge and information needs of informal caregivers in palliative settings. Data sources: Seven electronic databases were searched for the period January 1994--November 2006: Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Embase, Ovid, Zetoc and Pubmed using a meta-search engine (Metalib). Key journals and reference lists of selected papers were hand searched. REVIEW METHODS: Included studies were peer-reviewed journal articles presenting original research. Given a variety of approaches to palliative care research, a validated systematic review methodology for assessing disparate evidence was used in order to assign scores to different aspects of each study (introduction and aims, method and data, sampling, data analysis, ethics and bias, findings/results, transferability/generalizability, implications and usefulness). Analysis was assisted by abstraction of the key details of each study into a table. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies were included from eight different countries. The evidence was strongest in relation to pain management, where inadequacies in caregiver knowledge and the importance of education were emphasized. The significance of effective communication and information sharing between patient, caregiver and service provider was also emphasized. The evidence for other caregiver knowledge and information needs, for example in relation to welfare and social support, was weaker. There was limited literature on non-cancer conditions and the care-giving information needs of black and minority ethnic populations. Overall, the evidence base was predominantly descriptive and dominated by small-scale studies, limiting generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: As palliative care shifts into patients' homes, a more rigorously researched evidence base devoted to understanding caregivers knowledge and information needs is required. Research design needs to move beyond the current focus on dyads to incorporate the complex, three-way interactions between patients, service providers and caregivers in end-of-life care settings.
机译:目的:回顾当前对姑息治疗中非正式护理人员的知识和信息需求的理解。数据来源:1994年1月至2006年11月,搜索了七个电子数据库:Medline,CINAHL,PsychINFO,Embase,Ovid,Zetoc和Pubmed,使用了元搜索引擎(Metalib)。手工搜索关键期刊和参考文献列表。审查方法:纳入的研究为同行评审的发表原创研究的期刊文章。考虑到姑息治疗研究的多种方法,为了评估各个研究的不同方面(介绍和目标,方法和数据,抽样,数据分析,伦理学和偏见,调查结果/结果,可迁移性/一般性,含义和有用性)。通过将每个研究的关键细节抽象到表格中来辅助分析。结果:来自八个不同国家的34项研究被纳入。关于疼痛治疗的证据最充分,其中强调了照护者知识的不足和教育的重要性。还强调了患者,护理人员和服务提供者之间有效沟通和信息共享的重要性。其他照料者的知识和信息需求(例如与福利和社会支持有关)的证据较弱。关于黑人和少数民族人口的非癌症状况和护理信息需求的文献很少。总体而言,证据基础主要是描述性的,并由小规模研究主导,从而限制了推广性。结论:随着姑息治疗转移到患者家中,需要更加严格的研究证据基础来致力于了解护理人员的知识和信息需求。研究设计需要超越目前对二重体的关注,以纳入临终护理环境中患者,服务提供者和护理人员之间的复杂的三向交互。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号