...
首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >Sensitivity and specificity of a two-question screening tool for depression in a specialist palliative care unit.
【24h】

Sensitivity and specificity of a two-question screening tool for depression in a specialist palliative care unit.

机译:在专家姑息治疗病房中,针对抑郁症的两个问题筛查工具的敏感性和特异性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective in this study is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of a two-item screening interview for depression versus the formal psychiatric interview, in the setting of a specialist palliative in-patient unit so that we may identify those individuals suffering from depressive disorder and therefore optimise their management in this often-complex population. METHODS: A prospective sample of consecutive admissions (n = 167) consented to partake in the study, and the screening interview was asked separately to the formal psychiatric interview. RESULTS: The two-item questionnaire, achieved a sensitivity of 90.7% (95% CI 76.9-97.0) but a lower specificity of 67.7% (95% CI 58.7-75.7). The false positive rate was 32.3% (95% CI 24.3-41.3), but the false negative rate was found to be a low 9.3% (95% CI 3.0-23.1). A subgroup analysis of individuals with a past experience of depressive illness, (n = 95), revealed that a significant number screened positive for depression by the screening test, 55.2% (16/29) compared to those with no background history of depression, 33.3% (22/66) (P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: The high sensitivity and low false negative rate of the two-question screening tool will aid health professionals in identifying depression in the in-patient specialist palliative care unit. Individuals, who admit to a previous experience of depressive illness, are more likely to respond positively to the two-item questionnaire than those who report no prior history of depressive illness (P = 0.045).
机译:目的:本研究的主要目的是确定在姑息住院专科病房中进行两项抑郁症筛查访谈与正式精神病访谈的敏感性和特异性,以便我们可以识别出患有以下疾病的个体:抑郁症,因此可以在这种经常复杂的人群中优化治疗。方法:连续入院的前瞻性样本(n = 167)同意参加研究,筛查面试与正式的精神病学面试分开进行。结果:两项问卷的敏感性为90.7%(95%CI 76.9-97.0),但特异性较低,为67.7%(95%CI 58.7-75.7)。假阳性率为32.3%(95%CI 24.3-41.3),但发现假阴性率为9.3%(95%CI 3.0-23.1)低。一项对过去有抑郁症经历的个体(n = 95)进行的亚组分析显示,与没有抑郁症背景史的人相比,通过筛查测试筛查出的抑郁症阳性人数为55.2%(16/29), 33.3%(22/66)(P = 0.045)。结论:两问题筛查工具的高敏感性和低假阴性率将有助于卫生专业人员在住院专科姑息治疗病房中识别抑郁症。承认以前有抑郁症经历的人比没有报告抑郁症病史的人更有可能对两项调查表做出积极反应(P = 0.045)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号