...
首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >MORECare research methods guidance development: Recommendations for ethical issues in palliative and end-of-life care research
【24h】

MORECare research methods guidance development: Recommendations for ethical issues in palliative and end-of-life care research

机译:MORECare研究方法指南的制定:姑息治疗和临终护理研究中有关道德问题的建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: There is little guidance on the particular ethical concerns that research raises with a palliative care population. Aim: To present the process and outcomes of a workshop and consensus exercise on agreed best practice to accommodate ethical issues in research on palliative care. Design: Consultation workshop using the MORECare Transparent Expert Consultation approach. Prior to workshops, participants were sent overviews of ethical issues in palliative care. Following the workshop, nominal group techniques were used to produce candidate recommendations. These were rated online by participating experts. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse agreement and consensus. Narrative comments were collated. Setting/participants: Experts in ethical issues and palliative care research were invited to the Cicely Saunders Institute in London. They included senior researchers, service providers, commissioners, researchers, members of ethics committees and policy makers. Results: The workshop comprised 28 participants. A total of 16 recommendations were developed. There was high agreement on the issue of research participation and high to moderate agreement on applications to research ethics committees. The recommendations on obtaining and maintaining consent from patients and families were the most contentious. Nine recommendations were refined on the basis of the comments from the online consultation. Conclusions: The culture surrounding palliative care research needs to change by fostering collaborative approaches between all those involved in the research process. Changes to the legal framework governing the research process are required to enhance the ethical conduct of research in palliative care. The recommendations are relevant to all areas of research involving vulnerable adults.
机译:背景:对于姑息治疗人群引起的特殊伦理问题,几乎没有指导。目的:介绍关于协商一致的最佳实践的研讨会和共识演习的过程和结果,以适应姑息治疗研究中的道德问题。设计:使用MORECare透明专家咨询方法的咨询研讨会。在研讨会之前,向参与者发送了姑息治疗中伦理问题的概述。研讨会之后,采用名义上的小组技巧来提出候选建议。这些由参与专家在线评估。描述性统计数据用于分析同意和共识。叙事评论整理。背景/参与者:伦理问题和姑息治疗研究的专家应邀参加了伦敦的Cicely Saunders研究所。他们包括高级研究人员,服务提供者,专员,研究人员,道德委员会成员和政策制定者。结果:研讨会共有28名参与者。总共制定了16条建议。在研究参与问题上达成了高度共识,在研究伦理委员会的申请上也达成了中度到高度共识。关于获得和保持患者和家属同意的建议最具争议。根据在线咨询的意见,提出了九项建议。结论:姑息治疗研究的文化需要通过促进研究过程中所有参与者之间的协作方法来改变。需要改变管理研究过程的法律框架,以增强姑息治疗研究的道德行为。这些建议与涉及弱势成年人的所有研究领域有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号