首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >Opioids for the management of breakthrough cancer pain in adults: a systematic review undertaken as part of an EPCRC opioid guidelines project.
【24h】

Opioids for the management of breakthrough cancer pain in adults: a systematic review undertaken as part of an EPCRC opioid guidelines project.

机译:阿片类药物用于治疗成人突破性癌症疼痛:作为EPCRC阿片类药物指南项目的一部分进行的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The usual management of cancer related breakthrough pain is with supplemental doses of analgesics (commonly opioids) at a dose proportional to the total around-the-clock opioid dose. The aim of this review, undertaken as part of a European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC) project, to update the EAPC guidelines on opioid analgesics in cancer pain was to determine the evidence for the utility of opioids in the management of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer. Randomized controlled trials of opioids used as rescue medication were identified using electronic search strategies. Outcome measures sought were reduction in pain intensity measured by an appropriate scale, adverse effects, attrition, and patient satisfaction. The date of the final search was 31 July 2009. Eight studies (790 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Most studies investigated rescue medication delivery via the buccal or nasal transmucosal routes. Intravenous morphine has been compared with the transmucosal route and the two found to be effective. The oral route has not been formally tested although found to be an inferior comparator in one study. Most studies showed no meaningful relationship between the effective dose of transmucosal opioid and the around-the-clock scheduled medication or the previous rescue medication, although one study found a fixed proportion of either intravenous morphine or transmucosal fentanyl to be efficacious.
机译:癌症相关的突破性疼痛的常规治疗方法是按剂量补充镇痛药(通常为阿片类药物),该剂量与全日制阿片类药物剂量成比例。作为欧洲姑息治疗研究合作组织(EPCRC)项目的一部分进行的本次审查的目的是更新EAPC关于癌症疼痛中的阿片类镇痛药的指南,目的是确定阿片类药物在治疗患者突破性疼痛中的效用的证据。患有癌症。使用电子搜索策略确定了用作救援药物的阿片类药物的随机对照试验。寻求的结果措施是通过适当的量表测量疼痛强度的降低,不良反应,磨损和患者满意度。最终检索日期为2009年7月31日。八项研究(790例患者)符合纳入标准。大多数研究调查了通过颊或鼻腔经粘膜途径提供急救药物的方法。静脉内吗啡已与经粘膜途径进行了比较,发现两者是有效的。尽管在一项研究中发现口服途径较差,但尚未对口服途径进行正式测试。尽管一项研究发现固定比例的静脉内吗啡或经粘膜芬太尼有效,但大多数研究表明经粘膜阿片类药物的有效剂量与全天候计划用药或先前的急救药物之间没有有意义的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号