首页> 外文期刊>Paleoceanography >Orbital-scale timing and mechanisms driving Late Pleistocene Indo-Asian summer monsoons: Reinterpreting cave speleothem δ18O
【24h】

Orbital-scale timing and mechanisms driving Late Pleistocene Indo-Asian summer monsoons: Reinterpreting cave speleothem δ18O

机译:晚期晚更新世印度-亚洲夏季风的轨道尺度时间和机制:重新解释洞穴蛇麻草δ18O

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Southeast China cave δ18O, often interpreted as a pure East Asian summer monsoon proxy, lags maximum northern hemisphere summer insolation by 2.9±0.3 kyrs at the precession cycle. The Arabian Sea summer monsoon stack lags by 8±1 kyr, consistent with 13 other Indian and East Asian summer monsoon proxies from marine, lake, and terrestrial archives. This 5 kyr phase difference cannot be attributed to age control inadequacies in the marine chronology; it requires reconciliation in the context of proxy interpretation. Both of these lags are incompatible with a direct response to northern hemisphere summer insolation, implicating additional forcing mechanisms. Analysis of heterodynes in the cave δ18O spectrum demonstrates that variance contained in the Arabian Sea summer monsoon proxies also resides in the cave δ18O record. This variance is subtracted from the cave δ18O record yielding a residual that is highly coherent and in phase with precession minima, reflecting the impact of winter temperature change on cave δ18O (meteorological precipitation under cold conditions). Thus, we argue that the timing of light cave δ18O peaks cannot be interpreted as reflecting the timing of strong summer monsoons alone. The 2.9 kyr precession band phase lag of cave δ18O reflects the combined influence of summer monsoon forcing with a phase lag of 8 kyrs relative to precession minima and winter temperature forcing that is in phase with precession minima. This interpretation is consistent with modern seasonality in the amount and isotopic composition of rainfall in southeast China.
机译:东南洞δ18O通常被解释为一个纯东亚夏季风代理,在进动周期中比北半球夏季最大日照滞后2.9±0.3 kyrs。阿拉伯海夏季风叠加滞后8±1 kyr,与海洋,湖泊和陆地档案中的其他13个印度和东亚夏季风代理一致。这5年的相位差不能归因于海洋年代学中的年龄控制不足;它需要在代理解释的范围内进行和解。这两个滞后都与对北半球夏季日照的直接反应不兼容,这牵涉到其他强迫机制。对洞穴δ18O光谱中的外差进行分析表明,阿拉伯海夏季风代理中包含的方差也存在于洞穴δ18O记录中。从洞穴δ18O记录中减去这种变化,会产生高度连贯且与岁差极小相位一致的残差,反映出冬季温度变化对洞穴δ18O(寒冷条件下的气象降水)的影响。因此,我们认为轻度洞穴δ18O峰值的发生时间不能解释为仅反映夏季强季风的发生时间。洞穴δ18O的2.9年岁差带相位滞后反映了夏季季风强迫相对于岁差最小值相对于8 ky的相位滞后和冬季温度强迫与岁差最小值同相的综合影响。这种解释与中国东南地区降水的现代性和同位素组成相一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号