...
首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >Better off in the wild? Evaluating a captive breeding and release program for the recovery of an endangered rodent
【24h】

Better off in the wild? Evaluating a captive breeding and release program for the recovery of an endangered rodent

机译:在野外过得更好?评估圈养繁殖和释放计划以恢复濒临灭绝的啮齿动物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The critical question for the success of all captive breeding and release programs (CBRPs) is the same: will the benefit of augmenting or reestablishing a population with captive animals outweigh the loss of taking individuals from the wild? Yet, few studies have simultaneously evaluated the impact of removal of animals for captive breeding on the source population and the potential contribution of the released animals to the augmented populations. We used the endangered Key Largo woodrat (Neotoma floridana smalli, KLWR) as a model system to simultaneously examine the effect of animal removal, captive breeding, and reintroduction on the dynamics and persistence of a wild population. We used mark-recapture and telemetry data, as well as zoo records from a recent CBRP for the endangered KLWR to parameterize a matrix population model and to simulate the response of the KLWR population to alternative captive breeding and release strategies. Our results suggest that a CBRP as practiced previously would not contribute to KLWR recovery; instead, removal of wild KLWR for captive breeding could harm the population. Captive breeding programs will not contribute to the recovery of KLWR unless survival of released animals and breeding success of captive individuals are improved. Our study provides a framework for simultaneous consideration of animal removal from the wild, breeding success in captivity and survival of released animals for a comprehensive evaluation of captive breeding programs. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:所有圈养繁殖和释放计划(CBRP)成功的关键问题是相同的:增加或重建圈养动物种群的好处是否会超过从野外带走个体的损失?然而,几乎没有研究同时评估了圈养繁殖的动物移出对源种群的影响以及释放的动物对增加种群的潜在贡献。我们使用濒临灭绝的基拉戈(Wood Larrat)鼠(Neotoma floridana smalli,KLWR)作为模型系统,以同时检查动物移除,圈养和重新引入对野生种群动态和持久性的影响。我们使用了标记捕获和遥测数据,以及来自最近CBRP的濒危KLWR的动物园记录,以参数化矩阵种群模型并模拟KLWR种群对替代圈养和繁殖策略的响应。我们的结果表明,以前实践的CBRP不会促进KLWR的恢复。取而代之的是,去除野生的KLWR进行圈养繁殖可能会损害种群。除非提高释放的动物的存活率和圈养个体的繁殖成功率,否则圈养繁殖计划不会促进KLWR的恢复。我们的研究提供了一个框架,用于同时考虑从野生环境中移出动物,圈养繁殖成功和释放动物的存活,以全面评估圈养繁殖计划。 (C)2013 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号