...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >The role of pain coping strategies in prognosis after whiplash injury: passive coping predicts slowed recovery.
【24h】

The role of pain coping strategies in prognosis after whiplash injury: passive coping predicts slowed recovery.

机译:疼痛应对策略在鞭打损伤后的预后中的作用:被动应对可预示恢复速度减慢。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pain coping strategies are associated with pain severity, psychological distress and physical functioning in populations with persistent pain. However, there is little evidence regarding the relationship between coping styles and recovery from recent musculoskeletal injuries. We performed a large, population-based prospective cohort study of traffic injuries to assess the relationship between pain coping strategies and recovery from whiplash injuries. Subjects were initially assessed within 6 weeks of the injury, with structured telephone interview follow-up at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injury. Coping was measured at 6 weeks using the Pain Management Inventory and recovery was assessed at each subsequent follow-up period, using a global self-report question. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models showed that early use of passive coping strategies was independently associated with slower recovery. Depressive symptomatology (CES-D) was an effect modifier of this relationship. Withoutdepressive symptomatology, those using high levels of passive coping recovered 37% slower than those using low levels of passive coping (HRR=0.63; 95% CI 0.44-0.91). However, in the presence of depressive symptomatology, those using high levels of passive coping recovered 75% more slowly than those who coped less passively (HRR=0.25; 95% CI 0.17-0.39). In other words, those with depressive symptoms but who used few passive coping strategies recovered four times more quickly than those with depressive symptoms who used high levels of passive coping. Active coping showed no independent association with recovery. These findings highlight the importance of early assessment of both coping behaviors and depressive symptomatology.
机译:疼痛应对策略与持续性疼痛人群的疼痛严重程度,心理困扰和身体机能有关。但是,几乎没有证据表明应对方式与最近的肌肉骨骼损伤的恢复之间的关系。我们对交通伤害进行了一项基于人群的大型前瞻性队列研究,以评估疼痛应对策略与鞭打伤害恢复之间的关系。最初在受伤后6周内对受试者进行了评估,并在受伤后6周以及3、6、9和12个月进行了结构化的电话采访随访。使用疼痛管理量表在6周时测量应对情况,并在随后的每个后续随访期间使用一个全局自我报告问题评估其恢复情况。多变量Cox比例风险模型表明,被动应对策略的早期使用与恢复较慢独立相关。抑郁症状(CES-D)是这种关系的一种效应调节剂。在没有抑郁症状的情况下,那些使用高水平被动应对的人的恢复速度比使用低水平被动应对的人慢37%(HRR = 0.63; 95%CI 0.44-0.91)。然而,在存在抑郁症状的情况下,那些使用高水平被动应对的人比那些被动应对较少的人恢复慢75%(HRR = 0.25; 95%CI 0.17-0.39)。换句话说,那些具有抑郁症状但很少使用被动应对策略的人的康复速度比那些具有较高被动应对能力的抑郁患者的康复快四倍。积极应对并未显示出与康复的独立关联。这些发现突出了对应对行为和抑郁症状进行早期评估的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号