首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >Allodynia in patients with post-stroke central pain (CPSP) studied by statistical quantitative sensory testing within individuals.
【24h】

Allodynia in patients with post-stroke central pain (CPSP) studied by statistical quantitative sensory testing within individuals.

机译:中风后中枢疼痛(CPSP)患者的异常性疼痛通过个体内的统计定量感官测试进行研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The disinhibition hypothesis of post-stroke central pain (CPSP) suggests that 'the excessive response (dysesthesia/hyperalgesia/allodynia) is accompanied by a em leader loss of sensation' resulting from a lesion of a 'lateral nucleus' of thalamus or of 'cortico-thalamic paths' [Brain 34 (1911) 102]. One recent elaboration of this hypothesis proposes a submodality specific relationship, such that injury to a cool-signaling lateral thalamic pathway disinhibits a nociceptive medial thalamic pathway, thereby producing both burning, cold, ongoing pain and cold allodynia. The current study quantitatively evaluated the sensory loss and sensory abnormalities to discern submodality relationships between these sensory features of CPSP. The present results were statistically tested within individuals so that sensory loss and sensory abnormality are directly related by occurrence in the same individual. The results demonstrate that individuals with CPSP and normal tactile detection thresholds experience tactile allodynia significantly more often than those with tactile hypoesthesia. Most patients (11/13) exhibited hypoesthesia for the perception of cool stimuli, but few of these (2/11) showed cold allodynia. The most dramatic case of cold allodynia occurred in a patient who had a normal detection threshold for cold. Individuals with cold hypoesthesia, strictly contralateral to the cerebro-vascular accident (CVA or stroke), were often characterized by the presence of burning, cold, ongoing pain, and by the absence, not the presence, of cold allodynia. Overall, these results in CPSP suggest that tactile allodynia occurs in disturbances of thermal/pain pathways that spare the tactile-signaling pathways, and that cold hypoesthesia is neither necessary nor sufficient for cold allodynia.
机译:中风后中枢疼痛(CPSP)的抑制抑制假说表明,“过度反应(感觉异常/痛觉过敏/异常性疼痛)伴随着主要的感觉丧失”,这是由于丘脑的“外侧核”或“皮质-丘脑路径” [Brain 34(1911)102]。对这一假设的最新阐述提出了一种亚模态特异性关系,例如,对冷信号外侧丘脑通路的伤害会抑制伤害性内侧丘脑通路,从而产生灼热,感冒,持续性疼痛和感性异常性疼痛。当前的研究定量评估了感觉丧失和感觉异常,以辨别CPSP的这些感觉特征之间的亚模态关系。本研究结果在个体内进行了统计检验,因此感觉损失和感觉异常与同一个体的发生直接相关。结果表明,具有CPSP和正常触觉检测阈值的个体比具有触觉感觉低下的人经历触觉异常性疼痛的频率明显更高。大多数患者(11/13)因感觉到冷刺激而表现出感觉不足,但其中很少(2/11)表现出冷异常性疼痛。最明显的感冒异常性疼痛发生在感冒的检测阈值正常的患者中。患有冷感觉异常的患者,严格与脑血管意外(CVA或中风)相对,通常以灼热,寒冷,持续的疼痛的存在为特征,并且不存在(而不是不存在)寒冷的异常性疼痛。总的来说,CPSP中的这些结果表明,触觉异常性疼痛发生在热/疼痛途径的干扰中,而这些过程却没有触觉信号传导途径,并且冷感觉不足对于冷异常性疼痛来说既不是必需的也不是足够的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号