首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >The Amsterdam Pain Management Index compared to eight frequently used outcome measures to evaluate the adequacy of pain treatment in cancer patients with chronic pain.
【24h】

The Amsterdam Pain Management Index compared to eight frequently used outcome measures to evaluate the adequacy of pain treatment in cancer patients with chronic pain.

机译:阿姆斯特丹疼痛管理指数与八种常用结局指标进行了比较,以评估患有慢性疼痛的癌症患者中疼痛治疗的适当性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is no 'gold standard' to assess the adequacy of pain treatment in cancer patients. The purpose of the study is to explore the Amsterdam Pain Management Index, a newly designed measure to evaluate the adequacy of cancer pain treatment, and to compare it with eight frequently used outcome measures. The Amsterdam Pain Management Index compares patients' Present Pain Intensity, Average Pain Intensity, and Worst Pain Intensity with a composite score of analgesics used, while correcting for what a patient considers as a tolerable level of pain. The eight frequently used outcome measure consisted of three Pain Intensity Markers, the Pain Relief Scale, the Patient Satisfaction Scale, and three Pain Management Indexes. In a randomized controlled trial, 313 cancer patients with a pain duration of at least 1 month were included and followed-up three times until 2 months postdischarge at home. The experimental group received a Pain Education Program, consisting of tailored pain information and instruction. Results showed that, except for the three Pain Management Indexes, the agreement between the measures was very low to moderate. The test of known-groups comparisons and equivalence between groups indicated that the Amsterdam Pain Management Index showed promising results. The Pain Intensity Markers and the Pain Relief Scale were limited in discriminating between groups, while the Patient Satisfaction Scale showed no differences between patient groups. Although it was possible for the Pain Management Indexes to distinguish between patient groups, the differences were not in the expected direction. The ability of the outcome measures to detect changes over time was clearly demonstrated by all outcome measures. Effects of the intervention were only found for the Amsterdam Pain Management Index and patients' Substantial Worst Pain score. Although support was provided for the use of the Amsterdam Pain Management Index, more research is warranted.
机译:没有“金标准”来评估癌症患者疼痛治疗的充分性。这项研究的目的是探索阿姆斯特丹疼痛管理指数,这是一种新设计的评估癌症疼痛治疗是否充分的指标,并将其与八种常用的结果指标进行比较。阿姆斯特丹疼痛管理指数将患者目前的疼痛强度,平均疼痛强度和最坏的疼痛强度与使用的止痛药综合评分进行比较,同时校正患者认为可忍受的疼痛程度。八种常用的结果指标包括三个疼痛强度指标,疼痛缓解量表,患者满意度量表和三个疼痛管理指数。在一项随机对照试验中,纳入了313名疼痛持续时间至少为1个月的癌症患者,并进行了3次随访,直到出院后2个月为止。实验组接受了疼痛教育计划,该计划由量身定制的疼痛信息和指导组成。结果表明,除了三个疼痛管理指数外,这些措施之间的一致性非常低到中等。已知组之间的比较和组之间的等效性检验表明,阿姆斯特丹疼痛管理指数显示出可喜的结果。疼痛强度标记和疼痛缓解量表在区分各组方面受到限制,而患者满意度量表显示各患者组之间无差异。尽管疼痛管理指数可以区分患者组,但差异并不在预期的方向上。所有结果指标都清楚地表明了结果指标检测随时间变化的能力。仅在阿姆斯特丹疼痛管理指数和患者的最差疼痛评分中才发现干预效果。尽管为使用阿姆斯特丹疼痛管理指数提供了支持,但仍需要进行更多研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号