...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >Moderation and mediation in the psychological and drug treatment of chronic tension-type headache: the role of disorder severity and psychiatric comorbidity.
【24h】

Moderation and mediation in the psychological and drug treatment of chronic tension-type headache: the role of disorder severity and psychiatric comorbidity.

机译:缓和和调解在慢性紧张型头痛的心理和药物治疗中:疾病严重度和精神病合并症的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We evaluated two putative moderators of treatment outcome as well as the role of Headache Management Self-Efficacy (HMSE) in mediating treatment outcomes in the drug and non-drug treatment of chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). Subjects were 169 participants (M=38 yrs.; 77% female; M headache days/mo.=22) who received one of four treatments in the treatment of CTTH trial (JAMA, 2001; 285: 2208-15): tricyclic antidepressant medication, placebo, (cognitive-behavioral) stress-management therapy plus placebo, and stress-management therapy plus antidepressant medication. Severity of CTTH disorder and the presence of a psychiatric (mood or anxiety) disorder were found to moderate outcomes obtained with the three active treatments and with placebo, as well as to moderate the role of HMSE in mediating improvements. Both moderator effects appeared to reflect the differing influence of the moderator variable on each of the three active treatments, as well as the fact that the moderator variables exerted the opposite effect on placebo than on the active treatments. HMSE mediated treatment outcomes in the two stress-management conditions, but the pattern of HMSE mediation was complex, varying with the treatment condition, the outcome measure, and the moderator variable. Irrespective of the severity of the CTTH disorder HMSE fully mediated observed improvements in headache activity in the two stress-management conditions. However, for patients with a mood or anxiety disorder HMSE only partially mediated improvements in headache disability, suggesting an additional therapeutic mechanism is required to explain observed improvements in headache disability in the two stress-management conditions.
机译:我们评估了两种假定的治疗结果调节剂,以及头痛治疗自我效能(HMSE)在介导慢性紧张型头痛(CTTH)的药物治疗和非药物治疗的治疗结果中的作用。受试者为169名参与者(M = 38岁;女性77%; M头痛天数/月= 22),他们接受了CTTH试验的四种治疗方法之一(JAMA,2001; 285:2208-15):三环类抗抑郁药药物,安慰剂,(认知行为)压力管理疗法加安慰剂,以及压力管理疗法加抗抑郁药。发现CTTH疾病的严重程度和精神病(情绪或焦虑)疾病的存在可缓和通过三种有效疗法和安慰剂获得的预后,并缓和HMSE在介导改善方面的作用。两种调节剂作用似乎都反映了调节剂变量对三种有效疗法中每种疗法的不同影响,以及调节剂变量对安慰剂的作用与对主动疗法的作用相反。 HMSE介导了两种压力管理条件下的治疗结果,但是HMSE调解的模式很复杂,随治疗条件,结果指标和调节变量的不同而不同。不论CTTH障碍的严重程度如何,HMSE均完全介导了在两种压力管理条件下头痛活动的改善。然而,对于有情绪或焦虑症的患者,HMSE仅部分介导了头痛残疾的改善,提示需要一种额外的治疗机制来解释在两种压力管理情况下观察到的头痛残疾的改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号