...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >Group differences in pain modulation: pain-free women compared to pain-free men and to women with TMD.
【24h】

Group differences in pain modulation: pain-free women compared to pain-free men and to women with TMD.

机译:疼痛调节的群体差异:无痛女性与无痛男性和TMD女性相比。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previously reported differences in sensitivity to experimental pain stimuli between the sexes, as well as between temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients and healthy control subjects, may be attributable in part to group differences in two pain modulatory mechanisms: the baroreceptor reflex arc and the endogenous opioid system. Twenty-two pain-free (PF) men, 20 PF women and 20 women with TMD underwent two testing sessions in which heat pain and ischemic arm pain threshold and tolerance were measured during both sessions, but followed relaxation during one session and laboratory stress tasks during the other. Blood pressure (BP) and plasma -endorphin (E) concentration were measured during a baseline rest and during the stress or relaxation periods. PF men's threshold and tolerance for heat pain, but not for ischemic pain, exceeded that of PF women's during both sessions. PF women and TMD women did not differ in sensitivity to either pain modality; however, significantly lower ischemic pain threshold (IPTh) was linked to oral contraceptive use in PF women but not TMD patients. In the men alone, higher baseline systolic BP (SBP) was correlated with higher heat pain threshold on both days and heat pain tolerance on the stress day. Conversely, in TMD women, higher baseline SBP was correlated with lower ischemic pain tolerance (IPTol) on both days; BP and pain sensitivity were not related in PF women. In men, but not in PF or TMD women, stress systolic and diastolic BP were positively correlated with heat pain threshold and tolerance and higher diastolic reactivity to stress were correlated with higher heat pain and IPTh and tolerance. On the stress day, higher baseline E level was strongly associated with higher IPTol in PF women but marginally associated with lower IPTol in TMD women. Thus, it appears that a BP-related analgesic mechanism (probably baroreceptor-mediated) predominates in PF men, while an endogenous opioid mechanism predominates in PF women. Stress enhances the expression of these central mechanisms. Female TMDs appear unable to effectively engage normal pain-inhibitory systems; opioid receptor desensitization and/or downregulation are probably implicated, because TMDs' production of E appears normal.
机译:先前报道的性别之间以及颞下颌疾病(TMD)患者和健康对照组之间对实验性疼痛刺激的敏感性差异可能部分归因于两种疼痛调节机制的组差异:压力感受器反射弧和内源性阿片样物质系统。 22名无痛(PF)男性,20名PF女性和20名TMD女性接受了两次测试,在两次测试中均测量了热痛和缺血性臂痛阈值和耐受性,但在一次测试中放松并进行了实验室压力任务在另一个。在基线休息期间以及在压力或放松期间测量血压(BP)和血浆内啡肽(E)浓度。在这两个疗程中,男性PF对热痛而非缺血性疼痛的阈值和耐受性均超过女性PF。 PF妇女和TMD妇女对两种疼痛方式的敏感性没有差异。但是,PF妇女的口服局部避孕药使用与缺血性疼痛阈值(IPTh)明显降低有关,而TMD患者与之无关。仅在男性中,基线收缩压较高(SBP)与两天较高的热痛阈值和应激日的热痛耐受性相关。相反,在TMD女性中,这两天的基线SBP较高与缺血性疼痛耐受性(IPTol)较低相关。 PF妇女与BP和疼痛敏感性无关。在男性中,收缩压和舒张压与男性的热痛阈值和耐受性呈正相关,而在PF或TMD女性中则不然,而舒张压对压力的反应性与较高的热痛和IPTh和耐受性呈正相关。在压力日,较高的基线E水平与PF女性的IPTol升高密切相关,而与TMD女性的IPTol降低则密切相关。因此,在PF男性中,与BP相关的镇痛机制(可能是压力感受器介导的)占主导地位,而在PF男性中,内源性阿片类药物机制占主导地位。压力增强了这些中心机制的表达。女性TMD似乎无法有效地参与正常的疼痛抑制系统。阿片类药物受体的脱敏和/或下调可能与之相关,因为TMDs产生的E似乎正常。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号