...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >Psychological approaches during conscious sedation. Hypnosis versus stress reducing strategies: a prospective randomized study.
【24h】

Psychological approaches during conscious sedation. Hypnosis versus stress reducing strategies: a prospective randomized study.

机译:有意识的镇静过程中的心理学方法。催眠与缓解压力的策略:一项前瞻性随机研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Stress reducing strategies are useful in patients undergoing surgery. Hypnosis is also known to alleviate acute and chronic pain. We therefore compared the effectiveness of these two psychological approaches for reducing perioperative discomfort during conscious sedation for plastic surgery. Sixty patients scheduled for elective plastic surgery under local anesthesia and intravenous sedation (midazolam and alfentanil upon request) were included in the study after providing informed consent. They were randomly allocated to either stress reducing strategies (control: CONT) or hypnosis (HYP) during the entire surgical procedure. Both techniques were performed by the same anesthesiologist (MEF). Patient behavior was noted during surgery by a psychologist, the patient noted anxiety, pain, perceived control before, during and after surgery, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Patient satisfaction and surgical conditions were also recorded. Peri- and postoperative anxiety and pain were significantlylower in the HYP group. This reduction in anxiety and pain were achieved despite a significant reduction in intraoperative requirements for midazolam and alfentanil in the HYP group (alfentanil: 8.7 +/- 0.9 microg kg(-1)/h(-1) vs. 19.4 +/- 2 microg kg(-1)/h(-1), P < 0.001; midazolam: 0.04 +/- 0.003 mg kg(-1)/h(-1) vs. 0.09 +/- 0.01 mg kg(-1)/h(-1), P < 0.001). Patients in the HYP group reported an impression of more intraoperative control than those in the CONT group (P < 0.01). PONV were significantly reduced in the HYP group (6.5% vs. 30.8%, P < 0.001). Surgical conditions were better in the HYP group. Less signs of patient discomfort and pain were observed by the psychologist in the HYP group (P < 0.001). Vital signs were significantly more stable in the HYP group. Patient satisfaction score was significantly higher in the HYP group (P < 0.004). This study suggests that hypnosis provides better perioperative pain and anxiety relief, allows for significant reductions in alfentanil and midazolam requirements, and improves patient satisfaction and surgical conditions as compared with conventional stress reducing strategies support in patients receiving conscious sedation for plastic surgery.
机译:减轻压力的策略在接受手术的患者中很有用。催眠还可以减轻急性和慢性疼痛。因此,我们比较了这两种心理方法在整形外科手术中有意识地镇静期间减少围手术期不适的有效性。经知情同意后,计划在局部麻醉和静脉镇静下接受择期整形手术的60名患者(应要求提供咪达唑仑和阿芬太尼)纳入研究。在整个手术过程中,将他们随机分配到减轻压力的策略(对照:CONT)或催眠(HYP)。两种技术均由同一位麻醉师(MEF)进行。心理学家在手术过程中注意到患者的行为,患者注意到焦虑,疼痛,术前,术中和术后的控制感以及术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)。还记录了患者满意度和手术条件。 HYP组的围手术期和术后焦虑和疼痛明显降低。尽管在HYP组中对咪达唑仑和阿芬太尼的术中需求显着减少,但仍实现了焦虑和疼痛的减轻(阿芬太尼:8.7 +/- 0.9 microg kg(-1)/ h(-1)与19.4 +/- 2微克kg(-1)/ h(-1),P <0.001;咪达唑仑:0.04 +/- 0.003 mg kg(-1)/ h(-1)与0.09 +/- 0.01 mg kg(-1)/ h(-1),P <0.001)。与CONT组相比,HYP组的患者对术中控制的印象更高(P <0.01)。 HYP组的PONV明显降低(6.5%对30.8%,P <0.001)。 HYP组的手术条件更好。 HYP组的心理学家观察到较少的患者不适和疼痛迹象(P <0.001)。 HYP组的生命体征明显稳定。 HYP组患者满意度得分显着更高(P <0.004)。这项研究表明,与接受常规镇静整形手术的患者相比,传统的减轻压力策略支持相比,催眠术可以提供更好的围手术期疼痛和焦虑缓解,可以显着降低阿芬太尼和咪达唑仑的需求,并提高患者满意度和手术条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号