首页> 外文期刊>Synthese: An International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science >Reichenbach on the relative a priori and the context of discovery/justification distinction
【24h】

Reichenbach on the relative a priori and the context of discovery/justification distinction

机译:赖兴巴赫关于相对先验和发现/证明区分的背景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Hans Reichenbach introduced two seemingly separate sets of distinctions in his epistemology at different times. One is between the axioms of coordination and the axioms of connections. The other distinction is between the context of discovery and the context of justification. The status and nature of each of these distinctions have been subject-matter of an ongoing debate among philosophers of science. Thus, there is a significant amount of works considering both distinctions separately. However, the relevance of Reichenbach's two distinctions to each other does not seem to have enjoyed the same amount of interest so far. This is what I would like to consider in this paper. In other words, I am concerned with the question: what kind of relationship is there between his two distinctions, if there is any?
机译:汉斯·赖兴巴赫(Hans Reichenbach)在不同时期的认识论中引入了两个看似分离的区别。一种是在协调公理和联系公理之间。另一个区别是发现的背景和证明的背景之间。这些区别的地位和性质一直是科学哲学家之间正在进行辩论的主题。因此,有大量的作品分别考虑了这两种区别。但是,到目前为止,莱辛巴赫的两个区别之间的相关性似乎并没有引起同样的兴趣。这就是我在本文中要考虑的内容。换句话说,我关心的问题是:他的两个区别之间存在什么样的关系?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号