...
【24h】

Does routine pain assessment result in better care?

机译:常规疼痛评估能带来更好的护理吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although a variety of national organizations such as the Canadian Pain Society, the American Pain Society and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations have advanced the idea that pain should be assessed on a routine basis, there is little evidence that systematic pain assessment information is used routinely by clinicians even when it is readily available. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether systematic pain assessment information alters medical practitioners' clinical practices. METHODS: A population of seniors with complex medical problems who were evaluated by case coordinators was studied. Case coordinators were assigned to either an experimental or control patient assessment condition. Control condition patients were assessed as usual. In the experimental condition, a psychometrically valid pain assessment battery as well as the Geriatric Depression Scale - Short Form (because depression and chronic pain are frequently comorbid) were integrated into the routine case coordination assessment. A summary of the results of the depression and pain assessments was subsequently sent to physicians via mail and fax. Patients were also given copies of the assessment summaries and were asked to discuss these with their physicians. Physicians' medication prescriptions were monitored over time through the database of the provincial ministry of health. RESULTS: At the end of the study, no significant differences between experimental and control patients were found with respect to medications prescribed or patient self-reports of pain. Nonetheless, there was a significant relationship between Geriatric Depression Scale -- Short Form scores and pain medications prescribed for patients in the experimental condition. Moreover, indexes of overall pain intensity did not change significantly over time. CONCLUSIONS: The findings do not support the idea that the availability of systematic pain assessment information leads to change in clinician's medication practices. As such, educational interventions and public policy initiatives are needed to ensure that treatment providers do not only gather but also use pain assessment information.
机译:背景:尽管诸如加拿大疼痛学会,美国疼痛学会和卫生保健组织认可联合委员会之类的许多国家组织都提出了应定期评估疼痛的想法,但几乎没有证据表明系统性疼痛即使评估信息随时可用,临床医生也会常规使用这些信息。目的:确定系统的疼痛评估信息是否会改变医生的临床实践。方法:研究了由病例协调员评估的具有复杂医疗问题的老年人群体。将病例协调员分配到实验或对照患者评估条件。照例评估对照患者。在实验条件下,将心理上有效的疼痛评估表以及老年抑郁量表-简式(因为抑郁症和慢性疼痛经常并存)纳入常规病例协调评估中。随后将抑郁和疼痛评估结果的摘要通过邮件和传真发送给医生。还向患者提供了评估摘要的副本,并要求患者与医生讨论这些摘要。通过省卫生部的数据库对医师的药物处方进行了长期监控。结果:在研究结束时,在实验患者和对照患者之间,在处方药或患者自我疼痛报告方面均未发现显着差异。尽管如此,老年抑郁量表-简式分数与在实验条件下为患者开的止痛药之间存在显着关系。而且,总体疼痛强度的指标并没有随时间变化显着。结论:研究结果不支持以下观点:系统的疼痛评估信息的可用性会导致临床医生的用药习惯发生变化。因此,需要采取教育干预措施和采取公共政策措施,以确保治疗提供者不仅收集而且还使用疼痛评估信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号