首页> 外文期刊>Synthese: An International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science >Prior's paradigm for the study of time and its methodological motivation
【24h】

Prior's paradigm for the study of time and its methodological motivation

机译:先验的时间研究范式及其方法论动机

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A. N. Prior's writings should obviously be studied already for historical reasons. His inventions of modern temporal logic and hybrid logic are clearly important events in the history of logic. But the enduring importance of studying his works also rests on his methodological approach, which remains highly relevant also for systematical reasons. In this paper we argue that Prior's formulation in the 1950s of a tense-logical paradigm for the study of time should be understood in the light of at least three other principles or perspectives which were manifest already in his studies during the 1940s and further developed in the 1950s: (1) his emphasis on the value of interdisciplinary studies, (2) his reflections on formalisation and (3) his view of the role of symbolic logic in conceptual studies and in the philosophy of science. Our investigation into Prior's basic tenets and principles makes extensive use of Prior's Nachlass. It is thereby also exemplified how his correspondence and unpublished papers contain important information for a deeper understanding of Prior's paradigm for the study of time.
机译:A. N. Prior的著作显然应该出于历史原因而进行研究。他对现代时间逻辑和混合逻辑的发明显然是逻辑史上的重要事件。但是,研究他的作品的持久重要性也取决于他的方法论方法,由于系统的原因,该方法论仍然具有高度的相关性。在本文中,我们认为普里尔在1950年代为研究时间而提出的时态逻辑范式应至少根据其他三个原则或观点来理解,这些原则或观点已在1940年代的研究中得到了体现,并在1930年代得到了进一步发展。 1950年代:(1)他强调跨学科研究的价值;(2)对形式化的思考;(3)关于符号逻辑在概念研究和科学哲学中的作用的观点。我们对Prior的基本宗旨和原则的调查充分利用了Prior的Nachlass。因此,还可以举例说明他的书信和未发表的论文如何包含重要信息,以便更深入地了解普里尔的时间范式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号