首页> 外文期刊>Pancreatology: official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] >The selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the imaging of the axial biliary tree in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis.
【24h】

The selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the imaging of the axial biliary tree in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis.

机译:急性胆石性胰腺炎患者在胆道轴胆管成像中磁共振磁共振胆胰管成像的选择性使用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an emerging modality in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis (AGP). The aim of this study was to assess the impact following the introduction of MRCP in the management of AGP in a tertiary referral unit. METHODS: Patients presenting with AGP from January 2002 to December 2004 were reviewed to assess the impact of the introduction of MRCP in June 2003. The indication for MRCP was suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones in the absence of biliary sepsis. Definitive treatment for AGP was laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and sphincterotomy reserved for patients unfit for cholecystectomy and those with biliary sepsis. RESULTS: 249 patients were identified of whom 36 (14.5%) underwent ERCP and sphincterotomy as definitive treatment. 96 patients with a non-dilated CBD and normal or resolving liver function tests proceeded to laparosocopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC), 8 (8.5%) of whom had CBD stones intraoperatively. Eleven patients underwent cholecystectomy during pancreatic necrosectomy. Of those undergoing preoperative diagnostic biliary tract imaging, ERCP was undertaken in 57 patients and MRCP in 49 patients. There was no significant difference in serum bilirubin levels [ERCP 43 mmol/l (18-204) vs. MRCP 39 mmol/l (24-180), p = NS] or the proportion of patients with CBD stones [ERCP 10 (17.5%) vs. MRCP 7 (14.2%), p NS] between the two groups. Patients who underwent MRCP had a shorter median hospital stay [MRCP 5 days (range: 3-14) vs. ERCP 9 days (range: 4-20), p < 0.01] and higher rate of cholecystectomy during the index admission (MRCP 83.3% vs. ERCP 67.2%, p < 0.05). There was a high degree of correlation between preoperative MRCP results and findings of subsequent IOC or therapeutic ERCP (area under ROC curve: 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: MRCP is an accurate modality for imaging the axial biliary tree in patients with AGP. Selective use of MRCP reduces the need for ERCP and results in shorter hospital stay. and IAP.
机译:背景:磁共振胆胰胰管造影(MRCP)是急性胆石性胰腺炎(AGP)治疗中的一种新兴形式。这项研究的目的是评估在三级转诊单位中引入MRCP对AGP的管理产生的影响。方法:回顾性分析2002年1月至2004年12月期间出现AGP的患者,以评估2003年6月引入MRCP的影响。怀疑为MRCP的指征是在无胆汁败血症的情况下被怀疑是胆总管结石。 AGP的明确治疗方法是腹腔镜胆囊切除术,内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)和括约肌切开术适合不适合胆囊切除术和胆汁败血症的患者。结果:确定了249例患者,其中36例(14.5%)接受了ERCP和括约肌切开术作为确定的治疗方法。 96例未扩张CBD且肝功能检查正常或正常的患者进行了腹腔镜胆囊切除术和术中胆道造影(IOC),其中8例(8.5%)术中患有CBD结石。胰腺坏死切除术中有11例患者接受了胆囊切除术。在接受术前诊断性胆道成像的患者中,有57例接受了ERCP,有49例接受了MRCP。血清胆红素水平[ERCP 43 mmol / l(18-204)与MRCP 39 mmol / l(24-180),p = NS]或CBD结石患者的比例[ERCP 10(17.5)没有显着差异。 %)与MRCP 7(14.2%),两组之间的比较[p NS]。接受MRCP的患者中位住院时间较短(MRCP 5天(范围:3-14岁),而ERCP 9天(范围:4-20岁),P <0.01],并且在准入期间胆囊切除术的发生率更高(MRCP 83.3相对于ERCP的百分比为67.2%,p <0.05)。术前MRCP结果与随后的IOC或治疗性ERCP的发现之间存在高度相关性(ROC曲线下面积:0.94)。结论:MRCP是AGP患者轴向胆道树成像的准确方式。选择性使用MRCP可减少对ERCP的需求,并缩短住院时间。和IAP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号