首页> 外文期刊>Sleep medicine >The impact of obstructive sleep apnea and daytime sleepiness on work limitation.
【24h】

The impact of obstructive sleep apnea and daytime sleepiness on work limitation.

机译:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停和白天嗜睡对工作限制的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Many patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) participate in the work force. However, the impact of OSA and sleepiness on work performance is unclear. METHODS: To address this issue, we administered the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ), and an occupational survey to patients undergoing full-night polysomnography for the investigation of sleep-disordered breathing. Of 498 patients enrolled in the study, 428 (86.0%) completed the questionnaires. Their mean age+/-standard deviation (SD) was 49+/-12 years, mean body mass index (BMI) was 31+/-7 kg/m(2) mean apnea hypopnea index (AHI) was 21+/-22 events/h, and mean ESS score was 10+/-5. Subjects worked a mean of 39+/-18 h per week. The first 100 patients to complete the survey were followed up at two years. RESULTS: In the group as a whole, there was no significant relationship between severity of OSA and the four dimensions of work limitation. However, in blue-collar workers, significant differences were detected between patients with mild OSA (AHI 5-15/h) and those with severe OSA (AHI>30/h) with respect to time management (limited 23.1% of the time vs. 43.8%, p=0.05) and mental/personnel interactions (17.9% vs. 33.0%, p=0.05). In contrast, there were strong associations between subjective sleepiness (as assessed by the ESS) and three of the four scales of work limitation. That is, patients with an ESS of 5 had much less work limitation compared to those with an ESS 18 in terms of time management (19.7% vs. 38.6 %, p<0.001), mental-interpersonal relationships (15.5% vs. 36.0%, p<0.001) and work output (16.8% vs. 36.0%; p<0.001). Of the group followed up, 49 returned surveys and 33 who were using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) showed significant improvements between the initial and second follow-up in time management (26% vs. 9%, p=0.0005), mental-interpersonal relationships (16% vs. 11.0%, p=0.014) and work output (18% vs. 10%; p<0.009). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated a clear relationship between excessive sleepiness and decreased work productivity in a population referred for suspected sleep-disordered breathing. Screening for sleepiness and sleep-disordered breathing in the workplace has the potential to identify a reversible cause of low work productivity.
机译:背景:许多阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者参加了工作。但是,OSA和困倦对工作绩效的影响尚不清楚。方法:为解决此问题,我们对进行整夜多导睡眠监测的患者进行了爱普华兹嗜睡量表(ESS),工作限制问卷(WLQ)和职业调查,以研究睡眠呼吸障碍。在该研究招募的498位患者中,有428位(86.0%)完成了问卷调查。他们的平均年龄+/-标准偏差(SD)为49 +/- 12岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为31 +/- 7 kg / m(2)平均呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)为21 +/- 22事件/小时,平均ESS得分为10 +/- 5。受试者平均每周工作39 +/- 18小时。前两年完成调查的前100名患者进行了随访。结果:在整个组中,OSA的严重程度与工作限制的四个维度之间没有显着关系。然而,在蓝领工人中,在时间管理方面,轻度OSA(AHI 5-15 / h)和重度OSA(AHI> 30 / h)患者之间存在显着差异(时间限制为23.1%vs 43.8%,p = 0.05)和心理/人际互动(17.9%vs. 33.0%,p = 0.05)。相反,主观嗜睡(由ESS评估)与四个工作限制量表中的三个有很强的联系。也就是说,在时间管理(19.7%对38.6%,p <0.001),人际关系(15.5%对36.0%)方面,与ESS 18相比,ESS 5的工作限制要少得多。 ,p <0.001)和工作产出(16.8%对36.0%; p <0.001)。在随访组中,有49项返回的调查和33例使用持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的患者在时间管理的初始和第二次随访之间表现出显着改善(26%vs. 9%,p = 0.0005),人际关系(16%比11.0%,p = 0.014)和工作产出(18%比10%; p <0.009)。结论:我们已经证明,在因怀疑睡眠障碍而呼吸困难的人群中,过度嗜睡与工作效率下降之间存在明显的关系。在工作场所进行嗜睡和睡眠呼吸障碍的筛查有可能找出导致工作效率低下的可逆原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号