...
首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Sinus node injury as a result of superior vena cava isolation during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.
【24h】

Sinus node injury as a result of superior vena cava isolation during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.

机译:房室消融和房扑期间导管消融期间上腔静脉隔离导致的窦房结损伤。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The ectopic foci originating from superior vena cava (SVC) may act as triggers in the occurrence and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Unfortunately, the SVC isolation may result in potential dysfunction of sinus node. Furthermore, little is known about the occurrence of sinus node injury complicated by the SVC isolation. METHODS: Patients with AF or atypical atrial flutter experienced SVC isolation. The junctional rhythm or sinus arrest could be observed, if sinus node was injured. Atropin and dopamine administration ruled out the vagal irritation of sinus node, when junctional rhythm or sinus arrest occurred. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two patients who had no electrocardiogram signs of sinus node dysfunction before ablation experienced the SVC isolation. Six patients (three men, three women, mean age 62.5 +/- 8.6 years) had sinus node injury (4.5%, 6/132): four patients had junctional rhythm and one male patient had junctional rhythm and sinus arrest simultaneously; another male patient required AAI mode permanent pacemaker implantation due to the persistent junctional rhythm after SVC isolation. The ablation sites of all six patients closed to the junction of right atrium and SVC during the ablation of anterolateral free wall of the SVC. CONCLUSION: Sinus node may be damaged due to the ablation sites closer to sinus node. The definition of the junction of right atrium and SVC is very important, the ablation sites of anterolateral free wall of the SVC should not be too close to the SVC orifice.
机译:背景:起源于上腔静脉(SVC)的异位灶可能会触发房颤(AF)的发生和持续。不幸的是,SVC隔离可能会导致窦房结功能障碍。此外,对于由SVC隔离导致的窦房结损伤的发生知之甚少。方法:患有房颤或非典型房扑的患者经历了SVC分离。如果窦房结受伤,则可观察到节律性或窦性停搏。当出现节律性节律或窦性停搏时,阿托品和多巴胺的使用可以排除窦房结迷走神经。结果:132例消融前无心电图窦房结功能异常的患者经历了SVC隔离。六例患者(三名男性,三名女性,平均年龄为62.5 +/- 8.6岁)患有窦房结损伤(4.5%,6/132):四名患者出现交界性节律,一名男性患者同时出现交界性节律和窦性心律停止;另一名男性患者由于SVC隔离后持续存在连接节律而需要AAI模式永久性起搏器植入。在消融SVC前外侧游离壁的过程中,所有六名患者的消融部位均封闭在右心房和SVC的交界处。结论:由于靠近窦房结的消融部位可能会损伤窦房结。右心房和SVC交界处的定义非常重要,SVC的前外侧游离壁的消融部位不应太靠近SVC孔口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号