...
首页> 外文期刊>Sustainable Development >A Comparative Analysis of Sustainable Fishery Development Indicator Systems in Australia and Canada
【24h】

A Comparative Analysis of Sustainable Fishery Development Indicator Systems in Australia and Canada

机译:澳大利亚和加拿大可持续渔业发展指标体系的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper comparatively analyzes the systems in Australia and Canada from the perspective of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation's Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries No. 8. The results show that the key factors in the success of the Australian system are public participation, selecting an indicator with its objectives and improving management performance by the evaluation of the system. Further, the boundaries of the SFDIS should be the same as the boundaries of the management units and fisheries should be examined independently. The framework chosen by the Canadian system is more all-round, and can be combined with the PSR framework to maximize the management effects. Finally, techniques and specialist software such asfuzzy AHP etc. are 'well-suited to measuring weights and have the potential to be applied elsewhere'. Visual presentation is the best way to promote communication with the public. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation's kite diagram and the Sustainable Development Committee's dashboard of sustainability are two excellent visualizations.
机译:本文从联合国粮食及农业组织《负责任渔业技术准则》第8号的角度对澳大利亚和加拿大的渔业制度进行了比较分析。结果表明,澳大利亚制度取得成功的关键因素是公众参与,选择一个指标及其目标,并通过系统评估来改善管理绩效。此外,SFDIS的界限应与管理单位的界限相同,渔业应独立检查。加拿大体系选择的框架更为全面,可以与PSR框架结合使用以最大程度地发挥管理作用。最后,诸如模糊AHP等技术和专业软件“非常适合测量重量,并且有可能在其他地方应用”。视觉呈现是促进与公众沟通的最佳方式。联合国粮食及农业组织的风筝图和可持续发展委员会的可持续发展仪表板是两个很好的可视化对象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号