首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Permanent pacemakers: should straightened atrial leads be repositioned?
【24h】

Permanent pacemakers: should straightened atrial leads be repositioned?

机译:永久性起搏器:应该重新放置拉直的心房导线吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this study was to assess if atrial leads whose "J" configuration has straightened significantly on the postprocedural chest X ray should be repositioned. Between January 1996 and December 1997, 445 patients underwent dual chamber pacemaker implantation at the Papworth Hospital. Postprocedural chest X rays were available in 410 of these. The degree of straightening of the tip of the atrial lead was assessed from the lateral chest X ray and was graded as mild (-10 to +10 degrees from the horizontal), moderate (+10 to +30 degrees), or severe (> or = +30 degrees). Patients were followed with regard to atrial sensing and pacing characteristics, lead displacements, and lead revisions. Fifty-two (12%) patients had some degree of straightening (graded mild, moderate, severe) of the atrial lead on the postprocedure chest X ray (passive fixation in 48, active 4). Of these, 12 patients underwent next day lead repositioning, 5 of whom had abnormalities of pacing and/or sensing parameters. Seven patientstherefore underwent repositioning of the atrial lead despite normal pacing parameters in view of lead straightening alone. Of the 12 patients who underwent repositioning, 3 still had lead straightening after the second procedure. The cohort for follow-up consisted of 43 patients (24 [56%] men, age 69 +/- 11 years at the time of implant) who were left with significant atrial lead straightening but adequate atrial parameters. Straightening was mild in 26 patients, moderate in 10, and severe in 7 patients. At implant the P wave amplitude was 4.8 +/- 2.4 mV. Follow-up was for 4.8 +/- 2.1 years, a total of 178 patient years. At final follow-up, the P wave amplitude was 2.7 +/- 1.3 (P < 0.05 vs implant). Censoring events occurred in 16 cases, comprising 11 deaths (none suspected to be pacemaker or lead related), 3 cases of persistent atrial fibrillation, 1 system extraction for infection, and 1 lead extraction for erosion. There were no cases of inadequate atrial lead sensing or pacing in the remaining patients. Irrespective of the degree of lead straightening on the postoperative lateral chest X ray, atrial leads should not be repositioned unless there are abnormalities of pacing or sensing parameters.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估是否应重新定位其“ J”形在手术后胸部X射线上已明显拉直的心房导线。在1996年1月至1997年12月之间,有445例患者在Papworth医院接受了双腔起搏器植入术。其中有410例接受了术后X线胸片检查。从外侧胸部X射线评估房室导联尖端的矫直程度,分为轻度(与水平方向成-10至+10度),中度(+10至+30度)或严重(>或= +30度)。随访患者的心房感觉和起搏特征,导线移位和导线修订。 52名(12%)患者在术后X线胸片上出现一定程度的心房铅平直(分级为轻度,中度,重度)(被动固定48例,活跃4例)。在这些患者中,有12位患者在第二天进行了导线重定位,其中5位患者的起搏和/或感觉参数异常。因此,尽管起搏参数正常,但考虑到单独的导线拉直,有七名患者接受了心房导线的重新定位。在接受重新定位的12例患者中,有3例在第二次手术后仍进行了拉直。随访人群包括43例患者(24名[56%]男性,植入时年龄69 +/- 11岁),这些患者的心房导线拉直明显但心房参数适当。矫直为轻度26例,中度10例,重度7例。植入时,P波振幅为4.8 +/- 2.4 mV。随访时间为4.8 +/- 2.1年,共178个患者年。在最后的随访中,P波振幅为2.7 +/- 1.3(相对于植入物,P <0.05)。审查事件发生了16例,包括11例死亡(无一例怀疑与起搏器或铅相关),3例持续性心房颤动,1例系统感染引起的腐蚀和1例糜烂引起的提取。其余患者中未发现心房铅感应或起搏不足的情况。不管术后外侧胸部X射线的导线拉直程度如何,除非起搏或感觉参数异常,否则都不应重新定位心房导线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号