...
首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Influence of different atrioventricular and interventricular delays on cardiac output during cardiac resynchronization therapy.
【24h】

Influence of different atrioventricular and interventricular delays on cardiac output during cardiac resynchronization therapy.

机译:心脏再同步治疗期间,不同的房室和心室延迟对心输出量的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Restoration of the atrioventricular (AVD) and interventricular (VVD) delays increases the hemodynamic benefit conferred by biventricular (BiV) stimulation. This study compared the effects of different AVD and VVD on cardiac output (CO) during three stimulation modes: BiV-LV = left ventricle (LV) preceding right ventricle (RV) by 4 ms; BiV-RV = RV preceding LV by 4 ms; LVP = single-site LV pacing. We studied 19 patients with chronic heart failure due to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, QRS >/= 150 ms, mean LV end-diastolic diameter = 78 +/- 7 mm, and mean LV ejection fraction = 21 +/- 3%. CO was estimated by Doppler echocardiographic velocity time integral formula with sample volume placed in the LV outflow tract. Sets of sensed-AVDs (S-AVD) 90-160 ms, paced-AVDs (P-AVD) 120-160 ms, and VVDs 4-20 ms were used. BiV-RV resulted in lower CO than BiV-LV. S-AVD 120 ms and P-AVD 140 ms caused the most significant increase in CO for all three pacing modes. LVP produced a similar increase in CO asBiV stimulation; however, AV sequential pacing was associated with a nonsignificantly higher CO during LVP than with BiV stimulation. CO during BiV stimulation was the highest when LV preceded RV, and VVD ranged between 4 and 12 ms. The most negative effect on CO was observed when RV preceded LV by 4 ms. Hemodynamic improvement during BiV stimulation was dependent both on optimized AVD and VVD. LV preceding RV by 4-12 ms was the most optimal. Advancement of the RV was not beneficial in the majority of patients.
机译:恢复房室(AVD)和心室间(VVD)延迟可增加双心室(BiV)刺激所带来的血液动力学益处。这项研究比较了三种刺激模式下不同AVD和VVD对心输出量(CO)的影响:BiV-LV =左心室(LV)领先右心室(RV)4 ms; BiV-RV = LV在LV之前4毫秒; LVP =单站点LV起搏。我们研究了19例因缺血性或特发性扩张型心肌病导致的慢性心力衰竭患者,QRS> / = 150 ms,平均左室舒张末期直径= 78 +/- 7 mm,平均左室射血分数= 21 +/- 3%。通过多普勒超声心动图速度时间积分公式估算CO,并将样品体积放置在LV流出道中。使用了90-160 ms的感测AVD(S-AVD),120-160 ms的定速AVD(P-AVD)和4-20 ms的VVD组。 BiV-RV导致的CO低于BiV-LV。对于所有三种起搏模式,S-AVD 120 ms和P-AVD 140 ms导致CO的增加幅度最大。 LVP产生的CO增幅与BiV刺激相似。然而,与BiV刺激相比,LVP期间AV连续起搏与CO的升高无关。当LV先于RV时,BiV刺激期间的CO最高,而VVD介于4到12 ms之间。当RV比LV提前4 ms时,对CO的负面影响最大。 BiV刺激期间的血流动力学改善取决于优化的AVD和VVD。 RV在RV之前4-12 ms是最佳的。 RV的进展对大多数患者无益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号