...
首页> 外文期刊>Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer >Antiemetic prophylaxis and frequency of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in palliative first-line treatment of colorectal cancer patients: The Northern Bavarian IVOPAK i Project
【24h】

Antiemetic prophylaxis and frequency of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in palliative first-line treatment of colorectal cancer patients: The Northern Bavarian IVOPAK i Project

机译:在大肠癌患者的姑息性一线治疗中化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的止吐预防和频率:北巴伐利亚IVOPAK i项目

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate adherence to guidelines of antiemetic prophylaxis and frequency of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in the palliative first-line treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in Northern Bavaria. Methods: We collected detailed information on chemotherapy and supportive drugs in 103 patients within a prospective observational study. The study was conducted to determine quality of care within an interdisciplinary context (first endpoint) and direct costs of palliative treatment for patients with CRC between 2006 and 2010 (second endpoint, Emmert et al. (Eur J Health Econ, 2012) [1]). In this paper, we evaluate adherence to Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) 2006 recommendations for prophylaxis of CINV during the first administration of chemotherapy as well as incidence and grade of CINV within 120 h thereafter. Results: Of the patients studied, 95 patients (92 %) received moderately emetogenic (oxaliplatin- and/or irinotecan-containing combined chemotherapy treatment) and eight (8 %) received low emetogenic chemotherapy (either 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine monotherapy). Antiemetic prophylaxis could be assessed in 101 out of 103 (98 %) of patients. MASCC-recommended antiemetic prophylaxis was prescribed in three patients (3 %). Nonadherence was mainly caused by omission of dexamethasone. Nausea and/or vomiting occurred in 18 patients (18 %) within a 120-h period. All documented episodes were grade 1 or 2 according to the Common Toxicity Criteria of the National Cancer Institute. None of these patients received the recommended prophylaxis for CINV. In only one patient, antiemetic prophylaxis was intensified during the next chemotherapy application. Conclusions: In the Integrated Health Care in the Palliative Treatment of Colorectal Carcinoma (IVOPAK) I Project, adherence to the MASCC clinical recommendations was very poor. Extent of CINV in this patient population seems to be underestimated. There is an urgent need to improve clinicians' awareness of this patient-relevant side effect.
机译:目的:本研究旨在评估北巴伐利亚州姑息性一线治疗结直肠癌(CRC)患者的止吐预防指南和化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)频率。方法:我们在一项前瞻性观察性研究中收集了103例患者化疗和支持药物的详细信息。这项研究的目的是确定跨学科背景下的护理质量(第一终点)以及2006年至2010年间姑息治疗CRC患者的直接费用(第二终点,Emmert等人(Eur J Health Econ,2012)[1] )。在本文中,我们评估了对多国癌症支持治疗协会(MASCC)2006年推荐的预防性建议,即在首次化疗期间预防CINV以及之后120小时内CINV的发生率和等级。结果:在研究的患者中,有95名患者(92%)接受了中度致呕药(含奥沙利铂和/或伊立替康的联合化疗),八名患者(8%)接受了低致癌性化疗(5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)或卡培他滨单药治疗)。 103名患者中有101名(98%)可以评估止吐药的预防作用。对三名患者(3%)开具了MASCC推荐的止吐药预防措施。不粘连主要是由于地塞米松的遗漏引起的。在120小时内,有18名患者(18%)发生了恶心和/或呕吐。根据美国国家癌症研究所的通用毒性标准,所有记录的发作均为1级或2级。这些患者均未接受推荐的CINV预防措施。只有一名患者在下一次化疗期间加强了止吐预防。结论:在姑息治疗大肠癌(IVOPAK)I项目的综合医疗保健中,对MASCC临床建议的依从性非常差。该患者人群中CINV的程度似乎被低估了。迫切需要提高临床医生对该患者相关副作用的认识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号