...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgery >Vacuum-assisted closure in severe abdominal sepsis with or without retention sutured sequential fascial closure: a clinical trial.
【24h】

Vacuum-assisted closure in severe abdominal sepsis with or without retention sutured sequential fascial closure: a clinical trial.

机译:严重腹部脓毒症伴有或不伴有保留的真空辅助闭合缝合连续筋膜闭合:一项临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Multiple techniques have been introduced to obtain fascial closure for the open abdomen to minimize morbidity and cost of care. We hypothesized that a modification of the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) technique that provides constant fascial tension and prevents abdominis rectis retraction would facilitate primary fascial closure and reduce morbidity. METHODS: In all, 53 patients with severe abdominal sepsis were allocated randomly into 2 groups, and 30 patients were analyzed. In the VAC group, we included patients managed only with the VAC device, whereas the retentions sutured sequential fascial closure (RSSFC) group included patients to whom RSSFC was performed. RESULTS: The abdomen was left open for 12 days (P = .0001) with 4.4 +/- 1.35 changes per patient for the VAC group (P = .001) and 8 days with 2.87 +/- 0.74 dressing changes per patient for the RSSFC group, respectively. Abdominal closure was possible in only 6 patients in the VAC group, whereas for the RSSFC group, abdominal closure was achieved in 14 patients (P = .005). Planned hernia was exclusively decided in patients in the VAC group (P = .001). The hospital stay was 17.53 +/- 4.59 days for the VAC group and 11.93 +/- 2.05 days for the RSSFC group (P = .0001). The median initial intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was 12 mm Hg for the VAC group and 16 mm Hg for the RSSFC group (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the superiority of RSSFC compared with the single use of the VAC device. In our opinion, sequential fascial closure can immediately begin when abdominal sepsis is controlled.
机译:背景:已经引入了多种技术来实现腹部开放的筋膜封闭术,以最大程度地降低发病率和护理成本。我们假设对真空辅助闭合(VAC)技术进行修改,使其提供恒定的筋膜张力并防止腹直肌缩回将有助于初级筋膜闭合并降低发病率。方法:将53例重度脓毒症患者随机分为两组,分析30例。在VAC组中,我们纳入了仅使用VAC设备进行治疗的患者,而保留缝合缝合的连续筋膜闭合(RSSFC)组包括了接受RSSFC的患者。结果:VAC组(P = .001)的腹部开放持续12天(P = .0001),每位患者更换4.4 +/- 1.35(P = .001); 8天,使腹部弯曲,每位患者的敷料变化为2.87 +/- 0.74 RSSFC组。 VAC组中只有6例可能发生腹部闭合,而RSSFC组中有14例实现了腹部闭合(P = .005)。 VAC组患者完全计划有计划的疝气(P = .001)。 VAC组的住院时间为17.53 +/- 4.59天,RSSFC组的住院时间为11.93 +/- 2.05天(P = .0001)。 VAC组的中位初始腹腔内压力(IAP)为12 mm Hg,RSSFC组的中位初始腹腔内压力(IAP)为16 mm Hg(P <.0001)。结论:我们证明了RSSFC与单次使用VAC设备相比的优越性。我们认为,一旦控制了腹部败血症,就可以立即开始顺序筋膜闭合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号