...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgery >Biologic basis for the treatment of microscopic, occult well-differentiated thyroid cancer.
【24h】

Biologic basis for the treatment of microscopic, occult well-differentiated thyroid cancer.

机译:微观,隐匿性高分化甲状腺癌的治疗的生物学基础。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Management of thyroid microcancer or occult well-differentiated thyroid cancer (OWDTC) is controversial. Our present study compared some clinical features of OWDTC and gross well-differentiated 10-mm thyroid carcinoma (GWDTC), which may offer a basis for treatment policy. METHODS: From 1964 to 2000, 1000 patients underwent thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer. We randomly selected 428 cases for study in which node sampling was carried out in 88% of GWDTC and 60% of OWDTC and who were demographically comparable. All data were obtained by chart review and analyzed by chi-square test. RESULTS: With the maximum limit of 10 mm for defining OWDTC, we found 113 such cases with a mean size of 6.1 mm and 315 GWDTC cases with a mean size of 27.6 mm. The incidence of metastatic nodal disease was 16.8% in OWDTC cases and 25.7% in GWDTC cases (P = .057). Distant metastases occurred in 1 of 113 (0.9%) cases of OWDTC and 11 of 315 (3.5%) cases of GWDTC (P = .149). After a mean follow-up time of 55.8 months, neck metastatic recurrent disease occurred in 3 of 113 (2.7%) cases of OWDTC and 7 of 315 (2.2%) cases of GWDTC (P = .770). OWDTC was found in 11.1% of the GWDTC group undergoing an operation. Multicentricity occurred in 31.9% of OWDTC cases and 35.9% of GWDTC cases (P = .447). No cause-specific death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: One cannot be dogmatic in treatment of microcancer, but one is justified in extending similar treatment principles for OWDTC as in GWDTC, which in our center usually indicates near-total thyroidectomy and consideration for radioactive iodine ablation.
机译:背景:甲状腺微癌或隐匿性高分化甲状腺癌(OWDTC)的治疗存在争议。我们的研究比较了OWDTC和严重高分化的10毫米甲状腺癌(GWDTC)的一些临床特征,这可能为治疗策略提供基础。方法:从1964年至2000年,对1000例甲状腺癌患者进行了甲状腺切除术。我们随机选择了428例研究对象,其中88%的GWDTC和60%的OWDTC进行了节点抽样,并且在人口统计学上具有可比性。所有数据均通过图表审查获得,并通过卡方检验进行分析。结果:在定义OWDTC的最大限制为10毫米时,我们发现113例平均大小为6.1毫米的病例和315例GWDTC病例的平均大小为27.6毫米。在OWDTC病例中转移性淋巴结疾病的发生率为16.8%,在GWDTC病例中为25.7%(P = .057)。远处转移发生在113例OWDTC病例中的1例(0.9%)和315例GWDTC病例中的11例(3.5%)(P = .149)。平均随访时间为55.8个月后,在113例OWDTC病例中有3例发生了颈部转移性复发疾病(2.7%),在GWDTC 315例中发生了7例(2.2%)(P = .770)。接受手术的GWDTC组中有11.1%发现了OWDTC。多中心性发生在OWDTC病例的31.9%和GWDTC病例的35.9%(P = .447)。没有发生特定原因的死亡。结论:不能以教条来治疗微癌,但是有理由在扩大OWDTC的治疗原则上与GWDTC类似,这在我们中心通常表明甲状腺全切除术并考虑放射性碘消融。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号