首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Endoscopic sphincterotomy and interval cholecystectomy are reasonable alternatives to index cholecystectomy in severe acute gallstone pancreatitis (GSP).
【24h】

Endoscopic sphincterotomy and interval cholecystectomy are reasonable alternatives to index cholecystectomy in severe acute gallstone pancreatitis (GSP).

机译:内镜括约肌切开术和间歇性胆囊切除术是重症急性胆石性胰腺炎(GSP)指数胆囊切除术的合理替代方案。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: UK guidelines for gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) advocate definitive treatment during the index admission, or within 2 weeks of discharge. However, this target may not always be achievable. This study reviewed current management of GSP in a university hospital and evaluated the risk associated with interval cholecystectomy. METHODS: All patients that presented with GSP over a 4-year period (2002-2005) were stratified for disease severity (APACHE II). Patient demographics, time to definitive therapy [index cholecystectomy; endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES); Interval cholecystectomy], and readmission rates were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: 100 patients admitted with GSP. Disease severity was mild in 54 patients and severe in 46 patients. Twenty-two patients unsuitable for surgery underwent ES as definitive treatment with no readmissions. Seventy-eight patients underwent cholecystectomy, of which 40 (58%) had an index cholecystectomy, and 38 (42%) an interval cholecystectomy. Only 10 patientswith severe GSP had an index cholecystectomy, whilst 30 were readmitted for Interval cholecystectomy (p = 0.04). The median APACHE score was 4 [standard deviation (SD) 3.8] for index cholecystectomy and 8 (SD 2.6) for Interval cholecystectomy (p < 0.05). Median time (range) to surgery was 7.5 (2-30) days for index cholecystectomy and 63 (13-210) days for Interval cholecystectomy. Fifty percent (19/38) of patients with GSP had ES prior to discharge for interval cholecystectomy. Two (5%) patients were readmitted: with acute cholecystitis (n = 1) and acute pancreatitis (n = 1) , whilst awaiting interval cholecystectomy. No mortality was noted in the Index or Interval group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that overall 62% (22 endoscopic sphincterotomy and 40 index cholecystectomy) of patients with GSP have definitive therapy during the Index admission. However, surgery was deferred in the majority (n = 30) of patients with severe GSP, and 19/30 underwent ES prior to discharge. ES and interval cholecystectomy in severe GSP is associated with minimal morbidity and readmission rates, and is considered a reasonable alternative to an index cholecystectomy in patients with severe GSP.
机译:背景:英国胆囊结石性胰腺炎(GSP)指南主张在入院期间或出院后两周内进行明确治疗。但是,这个目标可能并非总是可以实现的。这项研究回顾了一家大学医院目前对GSP的管理,并评估了间隔性胆囊切除术的相关风险。方法:所有在4年期间(2002- 2005年)接受GSP治疗的患者均按疾病严重程度进行分层(APACHE II)。患者的人口统计资料,确定治疗的时间[索引胆囊切除术;内窥镜括约肌切开术(ES);回顾性分析间隔性胆囊切除术]和再次入院率。结果:100名GSP患者入院。疾病严重程度为54例,轻度为46例。 22例不适合手术的患者接受了ES作为确定性治疗,没有再次入院。 78例患者接受了胆囊切除术,其中40例(58%)进行了指数性胆囊切除术,38例(42%)进行了间隔性胆囊切除术。重度GSP的仅有10例患者接受了指数性胆囊切除术,而30例再次进行间隔性胆囊切除术(p = 0.04)。指数性胆囊切除术的中位APACHE评分为4 [标准差(SD)3.8],间隔胆囊切除术的中位APACHE评分为8(SD 2.6)(p <0.05)。指数性胆囊切除术的中位手术时间(范围)为7.5(2-30)天,间隔性胆囊切除术为63(13-210)天。百分之五十(19/38)的GSP患者在出院前进行间隔胆囊切除术前曾有ES。再次入院的患者为两名(5%):急性胆囊炎(n = 1)和急性胰腺炎(n = 1),同时等待间隔性胆囊切除术。在指数或间隔组中没有发现死亡率。结论:这项研究表明,GSP患者中62%(22例经内镜括约肌切开术和40例行胆囊切除术)接受了明确的治疗。但是,大多数GSP严重的患者(n = 30)推迟了手术,出院前有19/30的患者接受了ES。重度GSP的ES和间歇性胆囊切除术与最低的发病率和再入院率相关,并且被认为是重度GSP患者行指数性胆囊切除术的合理选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号