首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Computer-based laparoscopic and robotic surgical simulators: performance characteristics and perceptions of new users.
【24h】

Computer-based laparoscopic and robotic surgical simulators: performance characteristics and perceptions of new users.

机译:基于计算机的腹腔镜和机器人手术模拟器:性能特点和对新用户的看法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to define perceptions of the need and the value of new simulation devices for laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery. The initial experience of surgeons using both robotic and nonrobotic laparoscopic simulators to perform an advanced laparoscopic skill was evaluated. METHODS: At the 2006 Society of American Gastroesophageal Surgeons (SAGES) meeting, 63 Learning Center attendees used a new virtual reality robotic surgery simulator (SEP Robot) and either a computer-enhanced laparoscopic simulator (ProMIS) or a virtual reality simulator (SurgicalSIM). Demographic and training data were collected by an intake survey. Subjects then were assessed during one iteration of laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying on the SEP Robot and either the ProMIS or the SurgicalSIM. A posttask survey determined users' impressions of task realism, interface quality, and educational value. Performance data were collected and comparisons made between user-defined groups, different simulation platforms, and posttask survey responses. RESULTS: The task completion rate was significantly greater for experts than for nonexperts on the virtual reality platforms (SurgicalSIM: 100% vs 36%; SEP Robot: 93% vs 63%; p < 0.05). Prior robot use was predictive of task completion on the SEP Robot, and nonexperts were more likely to complete the virtual reality task on the SEP Robot than on the SurgicalSIM. Experts performed better than nonexperts for all performance measures on the ProMIS. All the survey scores pertaining to realism except image quality were higher for the ProMIS than for either virtual reality trainer. CONCLUSION: The task completion rate was the best discriminant of expert performance on both virtual reality platforms, whereas simulator metrics best discriminated expertise for the videoscopic platform. Similar comparisons for the virtual reality platforms were not feasible because of the low task completion rate for nonexperts. The added degrees of freedom associated with the robotic surgical simulator instruments facilitated completion of the task by nonexperts. All platforms were perceived as effective training tools.
机译:背景:本研究旨在定义对新型腹腔镜和机器人辅助手术模拟设备的需求和价值的认识。评估了外科医生使用机器人和非机器人腹腔镜模拟器执行高级腹腔镜检查技能的初步经验。方法:在2006年美国胃食管外科医生学会(SAGES)会议上,有63位学习中心的参与者使用了新的虚拟现实机器人手术模拟器(SEP Robot)和计算机增强的腹腔镜模拟器(ProMIS)或虚拟现实模拟器(SurgicalSIM) 。人口统计和培训数据是通过入学调查收集的。然后在SEP机器人和ProMIS或SurgicalSIM上进行一次腹腔镜缝合和打结的迭代过程中评估受试者。任务后调查确定了用户对任务现实性,界面质量和教育价值的印象。收集了性能数据,并在用户定义的组,不同的仿真平台和任务后调查响应之间进行了比较。结果:在虚拟现实平台上,专家的任务完成率显着高于非专家(SurgicalSIM:100%比36%; SEP Robot:93%比63%; p <0.05)。事先使用机器人可以预测SEP机器人上的任务完成,与SurgicalSIM相比,非专家更可能在SEP机器人上完成虚拟现实任务。在ProMIS上,所有绩效指标的专家表现都优于非专家。除了图像质量外,ProMIS的所有与真实感有关的得分均高于任何一个虚拟现实训练师。结论:在两个虚拟现实平台上,任务完成率是专家绩效的最佳判别,而模拟器指标可以最好地判别视频平台的专业知识。由于非专家的任务完成率低,因此虚拟现实平台的类似比较不可行。与机器人外科手术模拟器仪器相关的增加的自由度有助于非专家完成任务。所有平台都被视为有效的培训工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号