首页> 外文期刊>Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy and percutaneous techniques >Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Comparison analysis of feasibility and safety
【24h】

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Comparison analysis of feasibility and safety

机译:单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术:可行性和安全性的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To maintain operative safety, patient selection criteria for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) are more stringent than that for traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TLC). No other method could demonstrate the same feasibility and safety as TLC because the patient selection criteria were too restrictive for SILC to compare with TLC. In this study, we conducted a comparative study between our original SILC and TLC for demonstrating similar feasibility and safety among patients who had the same selection criteria as that for TLC. A statistical comparison between 114 patients of SILC and 201 patients of TLC was conducted during the same time period. The preoperative patient characteristics for SILC and TLC showed no statistical difference. In the operative result analysis, a significant disadvantage of SILC was the prolongation of operative time by only 15 minutes. The original SILC was as feasible and safe as TLC and virtually scarless cholecystectomy could be performed without any selection criteria. This was performed using only 2 trocars from an umbilical incision and 2 incisionless extracorporeal retraction devices.
机译:为了保持手术安全,单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)的患者选择标准比传统的腹腔镜胆囊切除术(TLC)更为严格。没有其他方法可以证明与TLC相同的可行性和安全性,因为患者选择标准对于SILC而言过于严格,无法与TLC进行比较。在这项研究中,我们在原始SILC和TLC之间进行了比较研究,以证明选择标准与TLC相同的患者之间具有相似的可行性和安全性。在同一时间段内对114例SILC患者和201例TLC患者进行了统计比较。 SILC和TLC的术前患者特征无统计学差异。在手术结果分析中,SILC的一个重大缺点是手术时间仅延长了15分钟。原始的SILC与TLC一样可行且安全,几乎可以在没有任何选择标准的情况下进行无疤胆囊切除术。仅使用来自脐带切口的2根套管针和2根无切口的体外牵开装置进行该操作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号