首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: A prospective randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: A prospective randomized controlled trial

机译:腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:经腹前腹膜(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)方法:前瞻性随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Minimal access approaches to inguinal hernia repair have added to the ongoing debate over the "best groin hernia repair." The present prospective randomized controlled trial was done to compare the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) techniques of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Methods: The present prospective randomized study was conducted between May 2007 and March, 2009 and included 100 patients suffering from uncomplicated primary groin hernia. Patients were randomized into group I (TEP) and group II (TAPP). Intraoperative variables and postoperative pain scores were recorded in a prestructured form. Results: One hundred patients were included in the study (TEP, 53; TAPP, 47). Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic profile and hernia characteristics. The average operative time was higher in the TAPP group (p = 0.209). The pain scores at 1 h and 24 h after surgery and at 3-month follow-up were significantly higher in the TAPP group (p < 0.05). The average follow-up was 30.5 months. In the TEP group, 37.8% of patients had seroma compared to 18.3% in the TAPP group (p = 0.021). However, there was a higher incidence of scrotal edema in the TAPP group (16 vs. 9, p = 0.009). The wound infection rates were equal (2% vs. 3%). There has been no recurrence in either group during the follow-up period of 44 months. Overall, the patients were more satisfied with TEP rather than TAPP (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In the present study, TEP had a significant advantage over TAPP for significantly reduced postoperative pain up to 3 months, which resulted in a better patient satisfaction score. The other intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and cost were similar in both groups. In terms of results, both repair techniques seemed equally effective, but TEP had an edge over TAPP.
机译:背景:腹股沟疝修补的最小途径已经增加了有关“最佳腹股沟疝修补”的争论。本项前瞻性随机对照试验用于比较腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的完全腹膜外(TEP)和经腹腹膜前(TAPP)技术。方法:本前瞻性随机研究于2007年5月至2009年3月进行,纳入100例患有单纯性腹股沟疝的患者。患者被随机分为I组(TEP)和II组(TAPP)。以预先构造的形式记录术中变量和术后疼痛评分。结果:一百例患者被纳入研究(TEP,53; TAPP,47)。两组在人口统计学特征和疝气特征方面具有可比性。 TAPP组的平均手术时间更长(p = 0.209)。 TAPP组在术后1小时和24小时以及3个月的随访时的疼痛评分显着更高(p <0.05)。平均随访30.5个月。在TEP组中,有37.8%的患者患有血清肿,而在TAPP组中则为18.3%(p = 0.021)。但是,TAPP组阴囊水肿的发生率较高(16比9,p = 0.009)。伤口感染率相等(2%vs. 3%)。在44个月的随访期间,两组均未复发。总体而言,患者对TEP而非TAPP更满意(p <0.05)。结论:在本研究中,TEP较TAPP具有显着的优势,可显着减少术后3个月的术后疼痛,从而使患者满意度更高。两组的其他术中并发症,术后并发症和费用相似。从结果来看,两种修复技术似乎同样有效,但是TEP在TAPP方面具有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号