首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of continuous infusion of local anesthetic to the diaphragm closure following laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair
【24h】

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of continuous infusion of local anesthetic to the diaphragm closure following laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair

机译:腹腔镜裂孔疝修补术后连续输注局部麻醉药至diaphragm肌闭合的疗效的随机双盲安慰剂对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia can result in significant postoperative pain requiring use of narcotics and patient dissatisfaction. A catheter-based delivery method that has demonstrated effectiveness and safety in other laparoscopic and open procedures (ON-Q, I Flow Corporation) was used to deliver pain medicine. This randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy of continuous infusion of local anesthetic to the diaphragm closure post laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. Methods: After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, qualifying patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia voluntarily consented to the study protocol. Standard techniques for routine closure of hiatal hernia repair were used. The ON-Q pain pump catheter was placed adjacent to the sutures used to repair the hiatal hernia, so that it rested between the diaphragm and the collagen patch used to reinforce the hernia repair. The pump infused either bupivacaine 0.5% or NaCl 0.9% at 2 cc/h for 5 days postoperatively. Patients kept a daily diary for pain scores, number of narcotic pain pills taken, and number of nausea pills taken. Results: Of the 46 patients enrolled in the study, seven were dropped for adverse events or noncompliance; 20 were given placebo (0.9% NaCl) and 19 were given 0.5% bupivacaine. Conclusion: This randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial showed no advantage in using the ON-Q pain pump in terms of providing measurable reduction of pain or concomitant narcotic or nausea medication use. Further studies are indicated to determine alternatives for reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.
机译:背景:腹腔镜修补裂孔疝可能导致严重的术后疼痛,需要使用麻醉剂和患者不满。在其他腹腔镜和开放手术(ON-Q,I Flow Corporation)中已经证明了有效性和安全性的基于导管的输送方法被用于输送止痛药。这项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的研究评估了在腹腔镜裂孔裂孔疝修补术后向隔膜封堵处连续输注局部麻醉药的功效。方法:在获得机构审查委员会的批准后,符合条件的接受腹腔镜修补裂孔疝的患者自愿同意研究方案。使用标准的常规技术进行封闭性裂孔疝修补术。将ON-Q止痛泵导管放置在用于修复食管裂孔疝的缝合线附近,以便将其置于隔膜和用于加强疝气修补的胶原蛋白膜片之间。术后5天内以2 cc / h的速度向泵中注入0.5%布比卡因或0.9%NaCl。患者每天记下疼痛评分,服用的止痛药和服用的恶心药的日记。结果:在研究的46名患者中,有7名因不良事件或不依从而被剔除;给予20例安慰剂(0.9%NaCl)和19例0.5%布比卡因。结论:这项随机双盲,安慰剂对照试验显示,使用ON-Q止痛泵无法带来可测量的疼痛减轻或同时使用麻醉药或恶心药物的优势。指出有进一步的研究来确定减轻腹腔镜裂孔疝修补术后术后疼痛的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号