...
首页> 外文期刊>Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation >Blood-brain barrier disruption and matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression during reperfusion injury: mechanical versus embolic focal ischemia in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
【24h】

Blood-brain barrier disruption and matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression during reperfusion injury: mechanical versus embolic focal ischemia in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

机译:再灌注损伤期间的血脑屏障破坏和基质金属蛋白酶9表达:自发性高血压大鼠的机械性与栓塞性局灶性缺血。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Most experimental models of cerebral ischemia use mechanical methods of occlusion and reperfusion. However, differences between mechanical reperfusion versus clot thrombolysis may influence reperfusion injury profiles. In this study we compared blood flow recovery, blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) expression in cortex after mechanical versus thrombolytic reperfusion in rat focal ischemia. METHODS: Male spontaneously hypertensive rats were used. Mechanical ischemia/reperfusion was achieved with the use of an intraluminal filament to occlude the middle cerebral artery for 2 hours. Thrombolytic reperfusion was achieved by administering tissue plasminogen activator at 2 hours after embolic focal ischemia. Regional cortical blood flow was monitored by laser-Doppler flowmetry. BBB permeability in cortex was measured by Evans blue dye leakage. Cortical MMP-9 levels were assessed with zymography and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Blood flow recovery during mechanical reperfusion was complete in both central and peripheral areas of ischemic cortex. However, after thrombolysis, reperfusion was incomplete, with moderate recovery in the periphery only. BBB permeability was mainly increased in the central regions of the ischemic cortex after mechanical reperfusion but was increased in both central and peripheral areas after thrombolysis. Overall, MMP-9 levels were higher after embolic versus mechanical ischemia/reperfusion, even though ischemic injury was similar in both models at 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the profiles of blood flow recovery, BBB leakage, and MMP-9 upregulation in mechanical versus thrombolytic reperfusion after focal ischemia.
机译:背景与目的:大多数脑缺血的实验模型都使用机械方法进行闭塞和再灌注。但是,机械性再灌注与凝块溶栓之间的差异可能会影响再灌注损伤情况。在这项研究中,我们比较了机械性和溶栓性再灌注大鼠局灶性缺血后皮层的血流恢复,血脑屏障(BBB)通透性和基质金属蛋白酶9(MMP-9)表达。方法:使用雄性自发性高血压大鼠。机械缺血/再灌注是通过使用腔内细丝阻塞大脑中动脉2小时来实现的。栓塞性局灶性缺血后2小时通过给予组织纤溶酶原激活剂实现溶栓再灌注。通过激光多普勒血流仪监测局部皮质血流。皮质中的BBB渗透性通过伊文思蓝染料渗漏测量。皮层MMP-9水平通过酶谱和免疫组织化学评估。结果:机械再灌注过程中的血流恢复在缺血皮层的中部和周边区域均已完成。然而,溶栓后,再灌注不完全,仅在外周有中等程度的恢复。机械再灌注后,BBB通透性主要在缺血皮层的中央区域增加,但在溶栓后在中央和外周区域都增加。总体而言,栓塞后与机械性缺血/再灌注相比,MMP-9水平更高,即使两种模型在24小时的缺血性损伤相似。结论:局灶性缺血后机械性与溶栓性再灌注的血流恢复,BBB渗漏和MMP-9上调之间存在显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号