...
首页> 外文期刊>Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation >Effect of area-based deprivation on the severity, subtype, and outcome of ischemic stroke.
【24h】

Effect of area-based deprivation on the severity, subtype, and outcome of ischemic stroke.

机译:区域性剥夺对缺血性中风的严重性,亚型和预后的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Markers of low socioeconomic status (deprivation) are associated with stroke and its causes. In the United Kingdom, area-based deprivation measures are available routinely through links with postal codes. We hypothesized that deprivation is associated with ischemic stroke risk factors, severity, subtype, and outcome. METHODS: We studied 2026 patients, each with at least 2 years of outcome follow-up by record linkage after first admission with ischemic stroke to an acute stroke unit. Baseline factors recorded routinely were age, sex, medical history, blood pressure, and stroke severity and subtype. Deprivation was assessed by the Womersley score (WS) and Murray score (MS). RESULTS: Higher WS and MS were associated with stroke at younger age (eg, WS linear regression coefficient (r)=-0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.51 to -0.01 per additional point), smoking (odds ratio [OR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.17), and claudication (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.17); WS was associated with higher systolic blood pressure (r=0.13; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.24); and MS was associated with severe stroke. Deprivation was not associated with case fatality in univariate analysis or after correction for all baseline factors. Deprivation was associated with readmission to hospital as a result of any vascular event in univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.09) and after correction for all baseline factors (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.10). CONCLUSIONS: Tackling health inequalities in stroke should focus on stroke primary prevention by tackling deprivation, including promoting changes in lifestyle.
机译:背景与目的:低社会经济地位(剥夺)的标志物与中风及其病因相关。在英国,通常可以通过与邮政编码的链接来使用基于区域的剥夺措施。我们假设剥夺与缺血性卒中危险因素,严重程度,亚型和结局有关。方法:我们研究了2026例患者,每例患者至少有2年的随访结果,方法是首次入院将缺血性卒中纳入急性卒中单位后进行记录联系。常规记录的基线因素是年龄,性别,病史,血压,中风严重程度和亚型。剥夺通过沃默斯利评分(WS)和穆雷评分(MS)进行评估。结果:较高的WS和MS与年轻时的卒中相关(例如WS线性回归系数(r)=-0.26; 95%置信区间[CI],每增加一个点为-0.51至-0.01),吸烟(赔率[ [OR],1.12; 95%CI,1.08至1.17)和c行(OR,1.09; 95%CI,1.01至1.17); WS与较高的收缩压相关(r = 0.13; 95%CI,0.02至0.24); MS与严重中风有关。单因素分析或校正所有基线因素后,剥夺与病例死亡无关。在单因素分析中,任何血管事件均导致剥夺与再次住院有关(危险比[HR]为1.05; 95%CI为1.02至1.09),并且在校正所有基线因素后(HR为1.06; 95%CI为1.02至1.10)。结论:应对中风的健康不平等现象应侧重于通过解决贫困(包括促进生活方式的改变)来预防中风的一级预防措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号