...
首页> 外文期刊>Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation >Does the application of X-ray contrast agents impair the clinical effect of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke patients?
【24h】

Does the application of X-ray contrast agents impair the clinical effect of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke patients?

机译:X射线造影剂的应用是否会损害急性缺血性中风患者的静脉内重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的临床效果?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Purpose-: Experimental data suggest a negative interaction between X-ray contrast agents and fibrinolytic efficacy of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rtPA). We hypothesized that the application of a contrast agent before intravenous thrombolysis with rtPA reduces its clinical efficacy in acute ischemic stroke. Methods-: We retrospectively studied consecutive ischemic stroke patients receiving contrast agents for computed tomography angiography before intravenous treatment with rtPA. We compared functional outcomes with an historical control group from the Canadian Alteplase for Stroke Effectiveness Study who did not receive contrast agents before thrombolysis with rtPA. Primary end point was favorable functional outcome at 90 days defined as modified Rankin Scale scores 0 to 2. We performed logistic regression analysis and a propensity score matching analysis to estimate the effect size of contrast agent use as a negative predictor of outcome. Results-: We identified 111 patients for the computed tomography angiography and 1119 patients for the control group. Proportions of favorable functional outcome were 47.7% (53/111 patients) for the computed tomography angiography group and 49.5% (542/1094 patients) for the control group (P=0.77). Adjusted probabilities for favorable outcome were 0.48 (95% CI, 0.37-0.58) and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.47-0.54), respectively. Contrast use was associated with reduced odds of favorable outcome (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.38-0.99). Propensity score matching suggested a larger effect size (OR, 10.0%; 95% CI, 0.5%-19.3%). Conclusions-: Our study did not show a significant negative clinical effect of X-ray contrast agents applied before intravenous thrombolysis with rtPA. However, to confirm a possible small negative interaction between contrast agents and rtPA, additional experimental and prospective clinical studies are needed.
机译:背景与目的:实验数据表明,X射线造影剂与重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rtPA)的纤溶功效之间存在负向相互作用。我们假设在rtPA静脉溶栓之前应用造影剂会降低其在急性缺血性卒中中的临床疗效。方法-:我们回顾性研究了在接受rtPA静脉治疗之前,接受造影剂进行计算机断层扫描血管造影的连续缺血性卒中患者。我们将功能结局与来自加拿大Alteplase中风有效性研究的历史对照组进行了比较,该对照组在使用rtPA溶栓之前未接受造影剂。主要终点是在90天时的良好功能预后,定义为改良的Rankin量表评分0到2。我们进行了逻辑回归分析和倾向评分匹配分析,以评估造影剂用作结果的阴性预测指标的影响大小。结果-:我们确定了111例计算机断层血管造影患者和1119例对照组患者。计算机断层扫描血管造影组的功能预后良好的比例为47.7%(53/111例),对照组为49.5%(542/1094例)(P = 0.77)。取得良好结果的调整后概率分别为0.48(95%CI,0.37-0.58)和0.51(95%CI,0.47-0.54)。对比使用与良好结局几率降低相关(OR,0.62; 95%CI,0.38-0.99)。倾向得分匹配显示更大的效应量(OR,10.0%; 95%CI,0.5%-19.3%)。结论-:我们的研究未显示在使用rtPA进行静脉溶栓之前应用X射线造影剂的临床显着负面影响。但是,要确认造影剂和rtPA之间可能存在小的负面相互作用,还需要进行其他实验和前瞻性临床研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号