...
首页> 外文期刊>Statistics in medicine >Non-parametric covariance methods for incidence density analyses of time-to-event data from a randomized clinical trial and their complementary roles to proportional hazards regression.
【24h】

Non-parametric covariance methods for incidence density analyses of time-to-event data from a randomized clinical trial and their complementary roles to proportional hazards regression.

机译:非参数协方差方法用于随机临床试验的事件发生时间数据的发病率密度分析及其对比例风险回归的补充作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The principal response criteria for many clinical trials involve time-to-event variables. Usual methods of analysis for this type of response criterion include product-limit estimators of cumulative survival for the treatment groups, (stratified) logrank tests to compare treatments, and proportional hazards regression models with treatment and relevant covariates. When adjustment for covariates is of some importance, the relative roles of these methods may be of some concern, particularly for confirmatory clinical trials which must provide convincing findings to regulatory agencies. Unadjusted methods may have lower power, but there are issues regarding adjustment for covariates that may be controversial. These issues include applicability of proportional hazards assumptions, whether the correct model has been specified, and whether there is parallelism between treatments for relationships with covariates. One way to address these issues is to use non-parametric analysis of covariance strategies with extensions to log incidence density estimation. The principal basis for this method is no association between covariates and treatment groups as provided by randomized assignment of patients to groups. The background theory and strategies for computation are described for this method. Aspects of its application are illustrated for a clinical trial with two treatment groups and 722 patients. The objective of analysis for this clinical trial is evaluation of treatment effects with and without adjustment for 22 a priori covariates and a stratification for three geographical regions. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:许多临床试验的主要反应标准涉及事件发生时间的变量。这类反应标准的常用分析方法包括治疗组累积生存率的乘积极限估计,比较治疗的(分层)对数秩检验以及具有治疗和相关协变量的比例风险回归模型。当对协变量的调整很重要时,这些方法的相对作用可能会引起关注,特别是对于必须向监管机构提供令人信服的发现的验证性临床试验。未经调整的方法的功效可能较低,但是有关调整协变量的问题可能会引起争议。这些问题包括比例风险假设的适用性,是否已指定正确的模型以及在处理与协变量之间的关系是否平行。解决这些问题的一种方法是使用协方差策略的非参数分析,并扩展到对数入射密度估计。这种方法的主要基础是协变量和治疗组之间没有关联,因为患者是随机分配到组中。描述了该方法的背景理论和计算策略。举例说明了其在两个治疗组和722名患者的临床试验中的应用。该临床试验的分析目标是评估有无22个先验协变量的调整和不调整的治疗效果以及三个地理区域的分层。版权所有2000 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号